Philosophical theory of determinism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dooga Blackrazor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinism Theory
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the philosophical theory of determinism and its relationship with quantum physics and chaos theory. Participants explore whether events in quantum mechanics are truly indeterminate or if they can be reconciled with deterministic principles. The conversation raises the question of whether probability exists or serves merely as a predictive tool when variables are unknown. A hypothetical scenario is presented regarding flipping a coin under identical conditions, leading to a debate about the feasibility of replicating such conditions in reality. It is noted that due to chaos theory and Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, perfect replication of antecedent conditions is impossible, which complicates the determinism argument. Ultimately, while some participants lean towards the belief in determinism, they acknowledge the inherent limitations in accurately reproducing experimental conditions due to the uncertainty in measurement.
Dooga Blackrazor
Messages
258
Reaction score
0
My knowledge of physics is plebian so please bare with me. I have been thinking about the philosophical theory of determinism lately, and I am trying to discover the scientific thoughts behind the matter.

In fact, I found that Einstein was worried by Quantum Physics and the presence of seemingly indetermined events. However, to my knowledge, these events are not proven to be indetermined - or are not necessarily irreconcilable within Chaos Theory?

Moving on, however, I have a question I am wondering if someone can answer. Does probability exist or is it a way to predict when variables cannot be determined? For instance, if the exact environmental circumstances were the same (angle, texture, weather, everything), and you flipped a coin, would you get the same result every time? I am inclined to say yes, but I am not knowledable in the area.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How much of the environment were you proposing to duplicate ?

There is a relationship between determinism and locality...
 
Tournesol said:
How much of the environment were you proposing to duplicate ?

There is a relationship between determinism and locality...

Theoretically, all of it. Time, place, area.
 
Dooga Blackrazor said:
My knowledge of physics is plebian so please bare with me. I have been thinking about the philosophical theory of determinism lately, and I am trying to discover the scientific thoughts behind the matter.

In fact, I found that Einstein was worried by Quantum Physics and the presence of seemingly indetermined events. However, to my knowledge, these events are not proven to be indetermined - or are not necessarily irreconcilable within Chaos Theory?

Moving on, however, I have a question I am wondering if someone can answer. Does probability exist or is it a way to predict when variables cannot be determined? For instance, if the exact environmental circumstances were the same (angle, texture, weather, everything), and you flipped a coin, would you get the same result every time? I am inclined to say yes, but I am not knowledable in the area.

Thanks
The correct answer is that nobody knows for certain - because the experiment (replicating the precise antecedent conditions) is impossible in the real world. This lies at the heart of (a) chaos theory and (b) Hesienberg's Uncertainty Principle.

Both (a) and (b) act to render it impossible to perfectly replicate any real-world experiment (we can of course replicate artificial world experiments that we already know to be deterministic and based on integer values rather than real values, such as those based on Conway's game of Life).

Having said that - I am inclined to agree with you when you say you are inclined to say yes. I believe determinism is true - which means that if one could perfectly replicate the antecedent conditions, then we have no rational reason (under a deterministic account) to suppose that the outcome would be any different.

Best Regards
 
Last edited:
Apart from the Aspect experiment...

(And if locality is true, you *can* duplicate the prior conditions)
 
Tournesol said:
Apart from the Aspect experiment...

(And if locality is true, you *can* duplicate the prior conditions)
the HUP prevents one from perfectly duplicating prior conditions - our knowledge of those prior conditions is limited in precision - thus any duplication would be no more than an approximation, within the precision allowed by the HUP

Best Regards
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Back
Top