Phone Book's Fans: Shocking Claim on Torsion

  • Thread starter Thread starter dextercioby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torsion
dextercioby
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
13,396
Reaction score
4,070
Here's something for the phone book's fans to chew on:

Surprisingly, on page #1278, in the index entry "Torsion", the 3 authors claim that "(torsion) not present in affine connection if equivalence principle is valid" and hint further to page #250 where they don't debate on it.

However, this assertion is terribly wrong, as Milutin Blagoevic' quoting [1] on page #66 of his book ("Gravitation and gauge symmetries") states after proving.

Surely, they wrote the book 3 years before the proof, but anyways, how could they do that ? They were already aware of both Cartan's theory (GR with torsion) and Lorentz gauge theory pioneered by Utiyama in his groundbreaking article in 1956 and refined by Sciama & Kibble. :rolleyes:

Daniel.

[1]P von der Heyde [1975] "The equivalence principle in the U_{4} theory of gravity", Nuovo Cim. Lett. 14, 250.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess MTW are humans too. Besides, they are experts for GR, but not for theories with torsion.
 
Different parts of the book were authored by the three coauthors, so one of them might have referred to material discussed in chapters written by another of the trio.

MTW has very, very few misstatements (I haven't tried to verify the claim that you uncovered one, but this is certainly possible).

Chris Hillman
 

Thread 'I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed'

OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
View full post »

Thread 'Synchronizing clocks in an inertial frame if light is anisotropic'

ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
View full post »

Thread 'Is the variation of the metric ##\delta g_{\mu\nu}## a tensor?'

From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
View full post »

Similar threads

Is there a quatum of torsion in Cartan Einstein Gravity? What is its spin?
Replies
12
Views
6K
Mathematica This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 253)
Replies
20
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top