Phosphoric acid titration calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the concentration of phosphoric acid (H3PO4) in cola using titration data. The user has performed titrations on three types of cola, obtaining pH and volume measurements at two equivalence points. They initially used a 3:1 ratio of NaOH to H3PO4 for calculations but suspect their results may be incorrect. The concentration of NaOH is 0.1M, and they are seeking assistance in accurately determining the overall concentration of H3PO4 based on their titration results. Clarification is requested on what has been neutralized at the first equivalence point, emphasizing the need for precise calculations rather than general reaction equations.
tq1088
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is that i am trying to find out the concentration of phosphoric acid in cola. I have completed the titration of 3 different types of cola. I have obtained the pH and volume on the titration graph. Note: I am trying to figure out the overall concentration of H3P04 first, not the H+ ions. I will do that later, but first i need to find the concentration of the H3P04. I have results like:

1st equivalence point: pH is 4.87 and Volume is 2.607

When 2.607ml of sodium hydroxide was added, the pH at the first equivalence point is 4.87.
The same follows for the second equivalence point.

2nd equivalence point: pH is 9.27 and Volume is 6.983.

Btw, the concentration of the sodium hydroxide is 0.1M and the amount of cola used is 50ml

The Attempt at a Solution


Note: The below example is with different values...from above

I have already done some calculating where i used a 3:1 ratio to find the concentration of the 1st and 2nd equiv point, but i think these are incorrect. For example i did this:

NaOH --> Volume is 1.964 (0.001964L) and Concentration is 0.1M H3P04 --> Volume = 50ml (0.05L) and concentration is unknown.

Ratio is 3:1 So 0.001964 x (1/3) = 6.54 X 10^-4

So H3P04 concentration is 6.54 x 10^-4 / 0.05

= 0.013M

I did the same for the 2nd equiv point but i used 3.286ml (0.003286ml) instead and i got 0.022M

I don't think this is correct because i need to find the overall concentration of the phosphoric acid.This is just one example of mine. I have much more results. If someone could help me calculate the concentration of the acid in the cola, i would really appreciate it.

Thanks

Homework Equations



This is the overall equation.

3NaOH + H3PO4 ->Na3PO4 +3H2O
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What has been neutralized at the first equivalence point? Write reaction equation - is it 3:1?

Do the same for the second equivalence point.

--
 
1st equiv point

H3PO4 (aq) --> H+ (aq) + H2PO4−

2nd equiv point

H2PO4 (aq) --> H+ (aq) + H2PO4 2−

3rd equiv point

HPO4 2− (aq) --> H+ (aq) + PO43−

But the 3rd doesn't really matter because it didn't show up on the titration graph.

The overall equation is

H3PO4 (aq) + 3NaOH (aq) --> Na3PO4 (aq) + H2O (l)

3:1 because the reaction occurs between 3 of NaOH and 1 of H3P04

and I am trying to find the overall concentration of the H3P04 and i got 2 equiv points on the titration graph.
 
Like the amount of NaOH needed to reach the 1st equiv point is 1.964ml. The pH was read at 5.14Then to reach the 2nd equiv point, 3.286 ml of NaOH is needed. The pH was read at 9.17
 
Geez, please read what I wrote and answer my question. I am not asking about overall reaction equation, I am asking what have been neutralized at the first equivalence point.

--
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top