Photoelectric effect and mirrors

AI Thread Summary
Mirrors reflect light due to their conductive surfaces, which contain a gas of loosely bound electrons. When photons strike the mirror, they excite these electrons, causing them to generate new photons that are identical to the incident ones. This process results in reflection rather than absorption, which is why the photoelectric effect does not occur in mirrors. The photoelectric effect only happens with specific metals when photons of the correct energy are absorbed, leading to the emission of electrons. In contrast, mirrors do not emit photoelectric effect electrons, as their structure is designed to reflect light instead.
greybird
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This may seem like a stupid question, but i just can't get my head around it. Basically i was wondering why a mirror refless light. Of course the simple answer suggests that it just reflexs it back (the basic laws of optics). But then i was also thinking about the photoelectric effect and was wondering why that didnt occur.

Surely the photons would hit the mirror and be absorbed causing the photoelectric effect. So i guess I am wondering why they don't get absorbed? or do they? What acctully causes reflextion on a sub atomic level?

Thanks for any response, my mind is in a state of self doubt and reality twisting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The photoelectric effect only occurs when photons of the correct energy are adsorbed by specific metals. Mirrors do not emit photoelectric effect electrons.

The reflections in mirrors occur because the surface of the mirror is a conductive surface with a electron gas type material. There are many weakly bound electrons which are free to migrate due the electromagnetic energy of the incident photons. The currents generated by the photons essentially result in emitted photons which are identical to the incident photons.
 
Thanks, i knew it had to have something to do with the photons exciting the electrons and in turn a photon being emmited - hense the fact i had my mind set on the photoelectric effect.

My mind is at rest now :)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top