Does the photoelectric effect influence the material properties of metals?

Shawnzyoo
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
I have been recently studying the photoelectric effect and electron emission from metals. I am curious about how (if at all) this could affect the material properties of the metal, like the resistivity or stress/strain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There would be almost no effect at all.Take a metal,chose a paralelelipedic shape and compute the approximate numbers of conducting electrons.Then see what is the typical photoelectrc current and try to make an idea about how many of the conduction electrons et pulled out of the metal.

Stress/strain not a chance.They're not really connected to conducting electrons...

Try to read some chapters from P.S.Kireev:"Semiconductor physics"...(Hopefully you americans translated it).

Daniel.
 
Semiconductors, however, are affected: the resistivity goes down (photoconductivity) and the ductility may increase.
 
so doesn't photoelectric effect, affect any of the material properties at all??
electron emission..such vibrations and all.. any other characeristic changes occurring??
 
tarunjot said:
so doesn't photoelectric effect, affect any of the material properties at all??
electron emission..such vibrations and all.. any other characeristic changes occurring??

The process itself doesn't affect the materials property that much, especially on metals. However, if one were to do this on less conducting materials such as semiconductors and even, in some instances, insulators, then one may encounter charging effects. This is where the material is momentarily charged and could not neutralize itself before the next electron emission occurs. This will slightly change the surface band structure and even the work function. However, in terms of structural changes, this is not a factor.

Zz.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top