Photoelectric effect question, help , thanks

RicXeoR
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Photoelectric effect question, help please, thanks!

In the standard experiment the stopping voltage is measured for several wavelengths of incident light. In this apparatus the photocathode is metallic potassium. Suppose that the apparatus has not been used for some time and that its calibration is uncertain. When monochromatic light with a wavelength of 569 nm shines on the potassium surface, the photoelectric current is stopped by a retarding voltage of 0.10 volts. When light with a wavelength of 405 nm is used, the stopping potential is 0.99 volts.
a) Determine from these data the value of h/e.
This i already got: 4.16862E-15 V*s

b) How does the value of h/e determined from these data compare to accepted value? Find the percentage difference between the value value from these data and the accepted value. [ 100·(experiment-accepted)/accepted ]
***I'm stuck here, e.g. what's the accepted value if part a is the experimental value, or is it the other way around, thanks: Can anyone please help me with this part of the problem, thanks yall!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both h (Planck's constant) and e (elementary charge) are constants in nature, so the "accepted value" (maybe you mean expected value?) is just h/e = 6.63x10-34/1.6x10-19 = 4.14x10-15. Compare that to the experimental value using the method that was already given to you.
 
yep, you do exacly that.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top