What caused the secondary peak in our photoluminescence experiment?

Septim
Messages
166
Reaction score
6
Greetings everyone,

We have performed a photoluminescence experiment and plotted the resultant spectra for two samples of different concentration after correcting for the response of the CCD camera and got the results that is attached to this post. My question is that in the sample with higher concentration the peak is at the same wavelength; however, we have an additional secondary peak at around 400 nm. We were not able to explain this and I would be happy to know why it was observed. Both of the samples were CdS quantum dot structures in toluen and the samples were excited with a 325 nm 50 mW continuous wave operating Kimmon UV laser.

Thanks in advance
 

Attachments

  • Graph3.jpg
    Graph3.jpg
    13 KB · Views: 641
Physics news on Phys.org
It may be QD1 and QD2 with different size dispersions.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top