Maxwell's Derivation of EM Wave Momentum: E/c

AI Thread Summary
Maxwell's derivation of electromagnetic wave momentum as E/c is linked to the principles of Special Theory of Relativity, which establishes the relationship E² = p²c² + m²c⁴. For massless particles like photons, this simplifies to E = pc. Additionally, quantum mechanics supports this relationship, showing that momentum p is defined as p = ħk, while photon energy is given by E = hν. The connection between frequency and angular frequency leads to the conclusion that ω = kc, allowing the expression of energy as E = ħω = ħkc = pc. This confirms the consistency of electromagnetic wave momentum with both relativity and quantum mechanics.
vin300
Messages
602
Reaction score
4
How did maxwell derive the momentum of electromagnetic wave to be E/c ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know how Maxwell derived it, or even whether he derived it. But there are two things I can say about where the result comes from.

First, you can show as a result of the Special Theory of Relativity that the general expression for the energy, E, of a particle is given by:

E2 = p2c2 + m2c4

where p is the momentum of the particle, m is its mass, and c is the speed of light. So, for a massless (m = 0) particle like a photon, this reduces to

E = pc​

Second, this result is not inconsistent with the results of quantum mechanics. For example, quantum mechanics says that for particle states in which there is a definite momentum, that momentum is given by

p = \hbar k​

where \hbar is h/2π, h is Planck's constant, and k = 2π/λ is the wavenumber of the particle. However, you may also be familiar with the result from quantum mechanics that the photon energy is given by:

E = hν​

where ν is the frequency of the photon. Now, remember that the relationship between frequency and angular frequency (ω) is ν = ω/2π. So we can write the photon energy as:

E = (hω)/2π = \hbar \omega​

I apologize for the hybrid between LaTeX and non-LaTeX equations. I couldn't be sure that hbar character would show up for all users, so I resorted to LaTeX to generate it. Anyway, so we have the results that:
p = \hbar k and E = \hbar \omega. How are ω and k related? Well, recall that the speed of a wave is the product of its wavelength and its frequency:

c = λν = (λω)/2π = ω/k​

Therefore:
ω = kc​

and:

E = \hbar \omega = \hbar kc = pc​

Same result.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top