Photon+photon -> neutrino + antineutrino ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PAllen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrino
PAllen
Science Advisor
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
2,530
High energy gamma rays in a region of reasonable matter density quickly produce a plethora of lower energy photons by a series of interactions, stopping when you have photons too low in energy to produce positron/electron pairs.

My question concerns the likelihood of the titular reaction (which would effectively carry the energy of photons away from a high density region). I found some very old papers discussing its likelihood in models predating the intermediate vector boson model of weak interactions. Can someone comment on the likelihood and point me at any not too advanced discussion in the context of the electro-weak theory?

[Edit: I also found good, modern, discussion of photon+<charged particle or nucleus> producing neutrino pairs. But the above, presumably less significant interaction, was not covered]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's going to be ridiculously small. A ballpark estimate would be the rate for light-by-light scattering, times (E_gamma/m_W)^4.
 
Is there some astrophysical context where you would get an insanely high density of high-energy gammas, but no matter? Evaporation of a microscopic black hole?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
It's going to be ridiculously small. A ballpark estimate would be the rate for light-by-light scattering, times (E_gamma/m_W)^4.

Ok, this is the take away point. Independent of details, and despite the near vanishing mass of neutrinos, this is going to be extremely rare because it has to be mediated by a virtual vector boson whose mass makes this unlikely. At all energy regimes, other results will be many orders of magnitude more likely. But this is not a prohibited interaction, just very unlikely.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top