Photonics vs Physics vs Mathematics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on selecting the most suitable PhD program for a mathematics undergraduate interested in energy advancement research, including topics like anti-matter annihilation, fusion, and photonic laser thrusters. Key considerations include whether to pursue a PhD in photonics, physics, or mathematics. If physics is chosen, areas such as mathematical physics, particle physics, or theoretical physics are suggested, while applied mathematics is recommended for those leaning towards math. The importance of relevant coursework in physics and prior research experience is emphasized for admission into a PhD program. The consensus is that a degree in applied mathematics can be viable for energy research, but it may require additional physics coursework and a strong thesis or research background to enhance employability in the field.
Gart11
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello, I was wondering if perhaps someone could provide some insight as to the PhD program that would prepare me the best for what I would like to do research in one day. I am currently a mathematics undergrad with 2 semesters left. I am torn between getting a PhD in photonics, physics, and mathematics. I am just not sure which would be the best fit for my area of interest. The area I am interested in doing research is energy advancement i.e. anti-matter annihilation, fusion, photonic laser thrusters etc. Also, if one were to suggest say physics as the most appropriate for these areas of research, is there a particular area of physics that would be best? Mathematical physics? Particle physics? Theoretical physics? etc. Same with math, if one were to suggest math as an appropriate fit what would be better, applied or pure? Thank you for any and all honest feedback, I'm sure a lot of questions come through here like this, but I just can't seem to pick out which would benefit me the most in a research energy industry. Ideally I would like to go to graduate school in an area of mathematics, including mathematical physics, applied or pure math, and if one of these will get me into the above areas of research please let me know and which one, however, if an area of physics would be a better fit I would be more than willing to make the switch.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gart11 said:
Also, if one were to suggest say physics as the most appropriate for these areas of research, is there a particular area of physics that would be best? Mathematical physics? Particle physics? Theoretical physics?

Applied or engineering physics in general. But pure physics does as well.

Gart11 said:
Same with math, if one were to suggest math as an appropriate fit what would be better, applied or pure?

"Applied" mathematics. The difference between pure and applied mathematics as study disciplines is that their emphasis is slightly different. But not very different.
 
Last edited:
But with a degree in applied mathematics would I be a viable candidate for getting hired to do research in antimatter research or fusion? Thank you for your response
 
Gart11 said:
But with a degree in applied mathematics would I be a viable candidate for getting hired to do research in antimatter research or fusion? Thank you for your response

I think it depends on how many courses you've studied in physics. If you've not done enough then it may require you to take more physics courses from somewhere or prove your knowledge of physics in other ways. Hiring also depends on the person and your previous research in the topic. In the admission to a PhD program they would be looking that you've studied relevant studies, have done some research (at minimum a thesis/dissertation that relates to the subject at some level) and/or have done some publications relating to the subject. Also work experience, if it's something related to the research.
 
Interesting. I definitely like the idea of applied mathematics. I like it's broad spectrum of application. I am just afraid that if I went down this route I may not be useful in energy advancement research. But I agree that will probably be reliant on my thesis indeed.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top