Photons Moving Through a Single Slit (Uncertainty)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating the uncertainty in momentum (\Delta p_{y}) of photons passing through a slit of width A and its effects on spot size at point B. The uncertainty principle is applied to relate the uncertainty in position (\Delta y) to momentum, leading to a derived formula for \Delta p_{y}. Participants emphasize the importance of considering the slit width when determining the spot size, noting that a larger slit width significantly affects the expected beam spot size. The conversation also highlights the need to express the angle (\theta) in terms of the slit width and wavelength for accurate calculations. Overall, a clear understanding of these relationships is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
trevor51590
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The diagram is attached. Photons are being beamed with momentum \rho_{0} and mass m at a slit of width A

Estimate the uncertainty \Delta p_{y} emerging from A
Sketch spot size at B as a function of slit width using the uncertainty principle
Determine minimum spot size expected at B as a function of L and the deBroigle wavelegth \lambda_{0}


Homework Equations


\Delta p_{y}\Delta_{y}=\frac{\hbar}{2}
\lambda=\frac{h}{p}


The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt for part one is shown in image two. I achieved an answer of \frac{h}{\Delta y}. \Delta y is represented by a in image one
Part two wants spot size as a function of width of slit - I found it as a function instead of L but I believe the sketch is relatively accurate. I'm not sure how to give it in the form it wants
Part three just throws me for a loop and I really don't have any idea

Thank you as always!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20130418_081112.jpg
    IMG_20130418_081112.jpg
    17.4 KB · Views: 399
  • IMG_20130418_081722.jpg
    IMG_20130418_081722.jpg
    23.3 KB · Views: 429
Physics news on Phys.org
For part 2, don't neglect the width of the slit - if the slit is very large, this is relevant. As a practical example, you do not expect a beam spot of some micrometers if the slit has a width of one meter (like a window). In addition, I think you should express theta in terms of the width of the slit and the wavelength.

If you fix that part, part 3 will make sense.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top