I Photosynthesis and quantum randomness

Atla2017
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Some studies suggest that during photosynthesis, electrons travel all possible paths simultaneously, and then always collapse at the reaction center.

My question is, doesn't that contradict quantum randomness? Shouldn't the location of the electron after the collapse be predictably random?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Atla2017 said:
Some studies suggest that during photosynthesis, electrons travel all possible paths simultaneously, and then always collapse at the reaction center.

My question is, doesn't that contradict quantum randomness? Shouldn't the location of the electron after the collapse be predictably random?
Welcome to the PF. :smile:

Can you post links to the studies you are referring to? That would probably help to get you better answers to your question. Thanks! :smile:
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to the PF. :smile:

Can you post links to the studies you are referring to? That would probably help to get you better answers to your question. Thanks! :smile:
Thanks! Here are two (as far as I know this topic is now heavily researched):

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876619611000684
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270879144_Quantum_Coherence_in_Photosynthesis_for_Efficient_Solar_Energy_Conversion

I'm a layman, I guess I can't tell whether or not there's a mechanism involved here that can nearly perfectly "steer" the energy transport. Without such a mechanism it would seem to me to contradict quantum randomness.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
954
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Back
Top