Physical meaning of the 2 eigenfunctions of Free Particle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physical interpretation of the eigenfunctions of a free particle as described by Schrödinger's equation. Participants explore the implications of the solutions in the context of a free particle encountering a potential barrier, focusing on the meaning of the terms in the wave function and their relationship to momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express curiosity about the physical meanings of the two terms in the wave function solution, specifically regarding their directionality in relation to a potential barrier.
  • One participant notes that the positive term in the wave function represents a wave traveling towards the barrier, while the negative term represents a wave reflecting from it, as explained by their teacher.
  • Another participant questions how the physical meaning is derived from the wave function, emphasizing the complex nature of the exponential terms and their sinusoidal representation.
  • A participant explains that the momentum operator applied to the wave functions yields positive and negative eigenvalues, indicating the direction of momentum associated with each term.
  • One participant cautions that the solution for a free particle is not square integrable, suggesting that it may not be the true solution, although they note it may not be a concern for the current course level.
  • Another participant reiterates that the positive eigenvalue from the momentum operator indicates a direction towards the barrier, while also noting that the interpretation can depend on the defined axes and the position of the barrier.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the interpretation of the wave function terms in relation to momentum and directionality. However, there is some uncertainty regarding the completeness of the solution and its implications in more advanced contexts.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the wave function not being square integrable, which raises questions about its validity as a true solution in quantum mechanics. This aspect remains unresolved in the discussion.

cks
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
For Schrödinger's equation

[tex]\frac{\d^2\psi}{dx^2} = - \frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}\psi[/tex]

Solving to find that

[tex]\psi = Aexp(ikx)+Bexp(-ikx)[/tex]

I am curious about the physical meanings of the two terms of the solutions.

In solving a free particle encountering a potential barrier, In the region before the encounter of the barrier, the solutions of the Shcrodinger equation is just the free particle equation above. My teacher says the term with the positive sign means it's a wave going towards the barrier, whereas the negative signs is the wave that reflect from it.

Well, the wave function is just the solution of the Schrödinger's equation and how does my teacher derives the physical meaning from it?? I mean the exponential function has complex term, which are actually sinusoidal but doesn't tell us anything about the direction of going??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cks said:
For Schrödinger's equation

[tex]\frac{\d^2\psi}{dx^2} = - \frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}\psi[/tex]

Solving to find that

[tex]\psi = Aexp(ikx)+Bexp(-ikx)[/tex]

I am curious about the physical meanings of the two terms of the solutions.

In solving a free particle encountering a potential barrier, In the region before the encounter of the barrier, the solutions of the Shcrodinger equation is just the free particle equation above. My teacher says the term with the positive sign means it's a wave going towards the barrier, whereas the negative signs is the wave that reflect from it.

Well, the wave function is just the solution of the Schrödinger's equation and how does my teacher derives the physical meaning from it?? I mean the exponential function has complex term, which are actually sinusoidal but doesn't tell us anything about the direction of going??

That is because the operator of MOMENTUM, being P = hbar/i d/dx, gives you, applied to the first term:

P {exp(ikx) } = hbar k exp(ikx), meaning that the first term is an eigenfunction of the momentum operator with eigenvalue hbar k.

P {exp(- ikx) } = - hbar k exp(-ikx), meaning that the second term is an eigenfunction of the momentum operator with eigenvalue - hbar k.

So the first wavefunction represents also a state with momentum + hbar k,
while the second wavefunction represents a state with momentum - hbar k.
 
Although I wouldn't worry about it for your course, you should perhaps at least be aware that your solution for a free particle is not the true solution, since it isn't square integrable. You'll see why if you do more advance QM courses.
 
I see. The reason that a momentum operator acts on the eigenfunction produces a positive eigenvalue means its direction is towards the barrier.

thanks .
 
cks said:
I see. The reason that a momentum operator acts on the eigenfunction produces a positive eigenvalue means its direction is towards the barrier.

Well, it means that your momentum is a positive number. Depends then on how your axes are defined and where the barrier is of course...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K