Physics 1: Mechanics (Calc Based): Can I Do Well?

  • Thread starter Thread starter samdude3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Class Physics
AI Thread Summary
Taking Physics 1: Mechanics alongside Calculus 2 and General Chemistry 1 can be challenging, especially for those without prior physics experience. Success in this course requires significant dedication and time, as physics involves a different way of thinking beyond just applying formulas. It is suggested to consider dropping one class if the workload becomes overwhelming, especially since managing multiple difficult classes can be demanding. Online resources like MIT OpenCourseWare, Yale Open Courses, and various YouTube channels can supplement learning, although some may lack practical problem-solving examples. For additional practice, textbooks such as "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" by Tipler and Mosca, as well as Halliday and Resnick or Young and Freedman, are recommended for their comprehensive problem sets. However, opinions on specific textbooks vary, with some finding certain texts inadequate for a calculus-based approach. Balancing work and study is crucial, and effective time management will be essential for achieving good grades.
samdude3
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey Guys,

So I am taking Physics 1: Mechanics (Calc Based) this semester along with Calc 2 and General Chem 1.

I am pretty worried since I have never taken a physics class and this class is notoriously hard. With enough studying and effort is this a class you can do well in regardless of taking previous Physics classes? Are there resources online besides khan academy that can help get me up to speed?

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey what's up? Is this at a University or Community College? To me Physics is hard and you have to dedicate a lot of time on it in order to understand it. Based on my experience, it is a different type of thinking. It is not just about knowing the formula and plug and chug. It can be pretty hard when you are introduced a problem that you have never seen before. If you think you can handle all of that then try it. You can always drop out from one of your classes during the first couple of weeks without a W if it becomes too hard. If I were you though, I would just take Physics and Calc2 or Physics, Calc2, and a laid back elective class. This would give you more time to focus on the two harder classes and have a better chance at an A. If you are plannng to transfer soon though then just take all three. To me this is a heavy load though. It's all your choice though. Good luck!
 
samdude3 said:
Are there resources online besides khan academy that can help get me up to speed?
Yes there are many exists such as MIT OCW or Yale Open Courses or You Tube Videos but decide which one is good for you.
 
This is at community college so I know they are not as intensive as they would be at a 4 year university. I feel like I need to get used to a schedule with multiple classes that are difficult since that will be the norm as I progress in my degree. I also work 30 hours a week but I don't think that should be an excuse for not getting good grades since it tests my time management skills.

I have watched the MIT OCW online lectures but they don't seem to do any practice problems that help you understand the topic, just how certain formulas are derived etc.

I would also like to know if there are any books with a lot of practice problems since my Physics book has limited practice problems.
 
What textbook are you using for the course? Generally most of the mainstream ones, Young and Freedman, Halliday and Resnick, etc.. will be perfectly fine for the scope of a physics I/II course in terms of practice problems. OCW MIT is an invaluable resource. For the duration of your course, Walter Lewin will become your best friend.
 
We are using "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" by Paul A. Tipler and Gene Mosca. I'm not sure how this compares with the texts you mentioned.
 
Tipler/Mosca is about the same as Halliday/Resnick, Young/Freedman etc. in terms of topics covered. Differences are basically a matter of taste.
 
samdude3 said:
we are using "physics for scientists and engineers" by paul a. Tipler and gene mosca. I'm not sure how this compares with the texts you mentioned.

This textbook is a joke, I don't understand how anyone could possibly recommend this book. It's barely calculus based to even begin with.
 
Back
Top