Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the transition from a bachelor's degree in physics to a master's degree in engineering. Participants explore the acceptance of physics graduates into engineering programs, the challenges of catching up on engineering coursework, and the prospects of employment in national laboratories such as Los Alamos.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Homework-related
Main Points Raised
- One participant questions the difficulty of transitioning from physics to engineering and whether engineering schools accept physics graduates.
- Another participant states that a graduate degree in engineering typically requires an undergraduate degree in engineering, suggesting that physics graduates may need to catch up on certain courses.
- A participant mentions finding programs that accept physics graduates and expresses a desire for a comfortable income over academic accolades.
- One participant shares their experience in an electrical engineering program where physics graduates were present and only needed to take a few additional courses, indicating variability in program requirements.
- Concerns are raised about the competitiveness of job opportunities at national labs compared to academic positions.
- A participant inquires about the situation in Australia, suggesting a need for more information on international perspectives.
- Another participant references a specific program (LEAP at Boston University) designed for students with non-engineering degrees to pursue engineering graduate studies, although they do not provide personal insights on the program.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a mix of viewpoints regarding the transition from physics to engineering, with some acknowledging the need for additional coursework while others highlight successful examples of physics graduates in engineering programs. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the ease or difficulty of this transition or the job market implications.
Contextual Notes
Some participants note the variability in program requirements and the necessity of catching up on engineering concepts, but specific details on which courses are required or how this impacts job prospects remain unresolved.