Physics in Men In Black: Math for Tunnel Scene

  • Thread starter Thread starter Redsox1918
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Movie Physics
AI Thread Summary
The tunnel scene in Men In Black illustrates key physics concepts, particularly the manipulation of gravity through a fictional "gravity regulator," allowing a car to drive on the ceiling. This scenario involves centripetal force, which keeps the car in a circular path, overcoming the downward pull of gravity. Calculating the minimum speed required for the car to remain on the ceiling can be done using the centripetal force formula, highlighting the relationship between speed, mass, and radius. Additionally, if the car were to stop suddenly, the dynamics of centripetal force and gravity would determine whether it falls back to the ground. Overall, this scene effectively demonstrates how physics can enhance cinematic action.
Redsox1918
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Recently was asked to make a presentation on some math involved in a movie. I chose the Men In Black. The scene I selected was the part where the 2 are in the Queens tunnel and they go on the ceiling of the tunnel and continue to go at an unusual high speed on the ceiling and eventually get down and out. I would just like some insight on what kind of math I should present and how to present it. Also some basic "if it were" kind of questions. Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You realize that car can only be stuck to the roof if there were a kind of a magnetic attraction (unlikely) or if there wings on the car were generating a lift. I Dont see what u mean maths. You will need a lot of complicated physics for I all know.
 


The tunnel scene in Men In Black is a great example of how physics plays a role in action scenes in movies. In this particular scene, the agents use a device called the "gravity regulator" to flip their car and drive on the ceiling of the tunnel at high speeds. This might seem like a far-fetched idea, but there is actually some real physics involved in making this scene possible.

To begin with, the concept of gravity plays a key role in this scene. Gravity is what keeps us grounded to the Earth, and it is also what keeps objects from flying off into space. In the movie, the gravity regulator is able to control the force of gravity, allowing the car to drive on the ceiling without falling. This is not possible in real life, but it makes for an exciting and entertaining scene in the movie.

Another important aspect of this scene is the concept of centripetal force. This is the force that keeps an object moving in a circular path. In the movie, the car is moving in a circular path as it drives on the ceiling of the tunnel. This is possible because the centripetal force is greater than the force of gravity pulling the car downwards. This is an important concept to understand when analyzing the physics behind this scene.

Now, let's consider some "if it were" questions. If the gravity regulator were real, what would be the minimum speed needed for the car to stay on the ceiling? This can be calculated using the formula for centripetal force, which is F = mv²/r, where m is the mass of the car, v is its velocity, and r is the radius of the circular path. By manipulating this formula, we can find that the minimum speed needed for the car to stay on the ceiling is directly proportional to the radius of the circular path.

Another interesting question to consider is if the car were to suddenly stop on the ceiling, what would happen? In this scenario, the car would experience a sudden change in velocity, which would result in a change in centripetal force. If the force of gravity is greater than the centripetal force, the car would fall off the ceiling and back onto the ground. This could be a fun and interactive way to engage your audience and get them thinking about the physics behind this scene.

In conclusion, the tunnel scene in Men In Black is a great example of how physics can be used to create thrilling and entertaining action scenes in movies. By understanding concepts such as gravity
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
32
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
222
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Back
Top