Physics Lectures: Should Focus on Problem Solving or Concepts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simfish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lectures Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether physics lectures should prioritize problem-solving of challenging problems instead of covering concepts that are already available in textbooks and online resources like MIT OpenCourseWare. It highlights that the approach may vary depending on the audience, such as theoretical physics students versus those in standard sequences for science and engineering majors. While solving problems in class could enhance students' problem-solving skills, there is a concern that this might lead to accepting physics concepts without understanding their derivations. The importance of professors demonstrating the validity of equations and concepts is emphasized, alongside the responsibility of students to critically assess the material. Overall, the debate reflects on the balance between conceptual understanding and practical problem-solving in physics education.
Simfish
Gold Member
Messages
811
Reaction score
2
Would it be a better idea for physics lectures to cover problem solving of difficult problems, rather than doing lectures on concepts that are repeated in textbooks and can be shown in video lectures, such as the ones in MIT OCW?

of course, it may depend on who the physics lectures are geared towards. if it's really theoretical, then it should be tailored to problem solving obviously. But what if it's a standard sequence that both science and engineering majors go through?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do have a valid point. If your physics professor were to solve physics problems in lecture, you'd probably end up being better at solving physics problems. However, you'd basically be accepting the physics on blind faith. That is not physics, science, or even academic. Therefore, I'd argue, the professor has an obligation to derive the equations and prove to you that he is not pulling them out of thin air. I'd also argue that you have an obligation to prove to yourself that all the equations and concepts are sound, although that would be hypocritical of myself. Just my $.02.
 
That wouldn't be fun Sim...
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top