Physics of Motorsports: Seat Bounce Debate

  • Thread starter Thread starter ProMed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics of "seat bounce" in motocross, with a focus on how it enables riders to achieve greater height and distance when jumping. Various theories have emerged, including the role of spring rebound, the rider's center of gravity (COG), and the potential influence of muscular "springs" in the arms and legs. A dedicated forum, www.seatbounce.com, has been created to facilitate this debate among enthusiasts and experts. The goal is to clarify the mechanics behind seat bounce and reach a consensus on its underlying physics. Contributions from physics experts are sought to resolve the ongoing debate.
ProMed
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

There has been an ongoing debate on several motocross message boards over the last few months regarding the physics behind a "seat bounce" (pictured below). It has even lead to the creation of a discussion board in the last two weeks called www.seatbounce.com.

I am not here to spam this board since I have no affiliation other than I am looking for Physics experts to help solve this problem. Performing a seat bounce allows a rider to fly both farther and higher than just hitting the jump/ramp while standing. Some guys are saying it is caused by the springs rebounding propelling the rider other says it is from the COG being lower allowing more traction, and others are saying it is from "springs" in the riders arms/legs.

http://www.seatbounce.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=19

The thread above is the most recent debate opened up and hopefully one of you experts could help end this once and for all!

Thank you!
Paul

http://www.transworldmotocross.com/mx/content/images/nov04/111604KG9V3119sm.jpg http://www.transworldmotocross.com/mx/content/images/nov04/111604KG9V3120sm.jpg http://www.transworldmotocross.com/mx/content/images/nov04/111604KG9V3121sm.jpg
http://www.transworldmotocross.com/mx/content/images/nov04/111604KG9V3122sm.jpg http://www.transworldmotocross.com/mx/content/images/nov04/111604KG9V3123sm.jpg http://www.transworldmotocross.com/mx/content/images/nov04/111604KG9V3124sm.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Could anyone help out with this?
 

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Physics Medical Physics from the UK to Canada
Replies
1
Views
3K
Praise My feedback, one month and half experience in PF so far
Replies
1
Views
3K
Model Pulley: Understanding System Physics
Replies
27
Views
10K
Focus all of your ire on me, if you would
Replies
4
Views
2K
News Illinois Governor Arrested for Selling Senate Seat
2
Replies
75
Views
11K
Apologize and Resolve Speculative Physics Debate: 65 Characters
Replies
3
Views
2K
Reviewing Thesis Topic on Evolutionary Theory
Replies
10
Views
5K
Three new books to read about expertise vs. democracy
Replies
4
Views
3K
Requesting suggestions for languages, libraries, and architectures for parallel (and sometimes non parallel) numerical and scientific computations
Replies
8
Views
4K
Is Self-Study Outside Academia Hindering My Progress in Physics?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top