Physics or mathematics master for mathematical physics?

AI Thread Summary
A European physics student is contemplating whether to pursue a master's degree in physics or mathematics, driven by a strong interest in mathematical physics. The student has completed a physics bachelor's degree and taken additional mathematics courses, meeting the requirements for a mathematics master's program. They express enjoyment in core physics courses but find specialized topics less appealing, while thriving in rigorous mathematics courses. The student considers the benefits of a mathematics master's supplemented with physics courses, believing this path may provide a stronger foundation for applying to PhD programs in mathematical physics. Concerns are raised about the competitive job market for those focusing solely on mathematics or mathematical physics, highlighting the importance of acquiring applied skills, such as programming. Despite recognizing potential employment challenges, the student values the opportunity to engage deeply with subjects of interest, even if it leads to less desirable job outcomes.
Incand
Messages
334
Reaction score
47
Hello! I'm a European physics student with an interest in what I believe to be mathematical physics. I'm torn between going for a master in physics or one in mathematics as more and more it seems to me that the research areas I'm interest are often conducted in the mathematics department.

While I'm about to complete a bachelor in physics I've also taken several extra courses in mathematics making me meet the requirements of a master in mathematics. To describe what I hope to be doing is to work on physics or physics related problems from a theorem proof perspective or at least involving interesting calculations in a mathematical framework.

So is there any way to tell which department would be a better fit? Generally I enjoyed the core physics courses, CM,EM, QM, Stat.Mech. etc. while more specialised topics didn't seem to be my thing. I also had a lot of fun in pretty much all the math courses I've taken, Abstract algebra, Real analysis, Fourier analysis, Differential Geometry, Topology and the proof/theorem style really seemed to be my thing.

Going for a physics master it seems to mainly contain courses that I'm very interested in and most likely would take either way. On the other hand the mathematics master allows me to take some of these physics courses while replacing the few more specialised/experimental courses with mathematics courses such a functional analysis, algebraic geometry etc. which all look very interesting. The main difference I think will be if it matters if I do my thesis in the physics or math department and which gives me a suitable background to be able to apply for phd positions in mathematical physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if you like doing math in a rigorous way, the maths MS supplemented with lots physics subjects seems like a better fit. After all, the maths you get taught by physicists is not explained rigorously, but intuitively, as you know.

However I think the job/PhD market is very competitive for people who only know maths/mathematical physics. I mean, if you want to do a PhD in a very theoretical field, you'll be competing with allot of freakishly good people, so you ought to at least learn some applied stuff, like programming, if you're planning on going the Maths route.
 
Last edited:
Wminus said:
Well if you like doing math in a rigorous way, the maths MS supplemented with lots physics subjects seems like a better fit. After all, the maths you get taught by physicists is not explained rigorously, but intuitively, as you know.
Thank you for your reply! That's what I'm starting to think as well, that mathematics with physics courses may be the better option. And yes the rigour is something that often bother me during physics classes and I find a spend a lot of time trying to fill in all the steps I don't feel are always justified.

Wminus said:
However I think the job/PhD market is very competitive for people who only know maths/mathematical physics. I mean, if you want to do a PhD in a very theoretical field, you'll be competing with allot of freakishly good people, so you ought to at least learn some applied stuff, like programming, if you're planning on going the Maths route.
I'm aware that I probably won't get a job working in these areas but the way I see it it's an opportunity to do something I find really interesting for a few years. I got quite a lot of programming experience and have had some minor programming work in the past but it's not something I really enjoy. Even there I find myself more interested in the theoretical parts as in algorithms and data structures but at least that's a little more applied. Still I don't expect to be unemployed after but rather that I may end up working with something that I won't enjoy as much but I think that's true for most people.
 
  • Like
Likes Wminus
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top