MHB Physics Spring Compression Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dethrone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Spring
Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
Suppose a mass, $m$, is dropped from a height $L$ relative to the top of a uncompressed spring, which is on the surface of the floor. Calculate the compression, $\Delta x$ of the spring, given the mass.

Okay, so I completely made up this question, but here is my confusion:

Which equation is appropriate to solve this?

$$mgL=\frac{1}{2}k(\Delta x)^2-mg \Delta x$$

OR

$$mgL=\frac{1}{2}k\Delta x^2$$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you have any information regarding the stiffness of the spring? Are you considering that the weight of the mass is still working on the spring as it's being compressed?
 
All needed values are given, including $k$. I'm not sure whether or not the mass is still working on it...the question (from my test) was simply the effect of the mass dropping on an uncompressed spring, and finding its compression/deflection, or whatever you want to call it :D
 
Rido12 said:
All needed values are given, including $k$. I'm not sure whether or not the mass is still working on it...the question (from my test) was simply the effect of the mass dropping on an uncompressed spring, and finding its compression/deflection, or whatever you want to call it :D

Well, obviously energy considerations are the way to go here, as you are doing. The initial gravitational potential energy, will be converted into the potential energy of the spring.

I would say your first equation is correct, since it accounts for the additional gravitational energy lost during compression.
 
Rido12 said:
Which equation is appropriate to solve this?

$$mgL=\frac{1}{2}k(\Delta x)^2-mg \Delta x$$
Looks good to me. Typically we set an origin for the spring potential energy to be at the top of the uncompressed spring as the spring has no PE there and choose a positive direction in the direction of the spring compression. So you can actually get rid of the deltas there.

-Dan
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top