MHB Physics Spring Compression Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dethrone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Spring
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the compression of a spring when a mass is dropped from a height, the appropriate equation to use is mgL = (1/2)k(Δx)^2 - mgΔx, as it accounts for both gravitational potential energy and the energy stored in the spring. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the gravitational force acting on the mass during compression. Energy conservation principles are highlighted, indicating that the initial gravitational potential energy is converted into the spring's potential energy. The choice of origin for potential energy is also noted, typically set at the top of the uncompressed spring. This approach ensures accurate calculations of spring compression.
Dethrone
Messages
716
Reaction score
0
Suppose a mass, $m$, is dropped from a height $L$ relative to the top of a uncompressed spring, which is on the surface of the floor. Calculate the compression, $\Delta x$ of the spring, given the mass.

Okay, so I completely made up this question, but here is my confusion:

Which equation is appropriate to solve this?

$$mgL=\frac{1}{2}k(\Delta x)^2-mg \Delta x$$

OR

$$mgL=\frac{1}{2}k\Delta x^2$$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you have any information regarding the stiffness of the spring? Are you considering that the weight of the mass is still working on the spring as it's being compressed?
 
All needed values are given, including $k$. I'm not sure whether or not the mass is still working on it...the question (from my test) was simply the effect of the mass dropping on an uncompressed spring, and finding its compression/deflection, or whatever you want to call it :D
 
Rido12 said:
All needed values are given, including $k$. I'm not sure whether or not the mass is still working on it...the question (from my test) was simply the effect of the mass dropping on an uncompressed spring, and finding its compression/deflection, or whatever you want to call it :D

Well, obviously energy considerations are the way to go here, as you are doing. The initial gravitational potential energy, will be converted into the potential energy of the spring.

I would say your first equation is correct, since it accounts for the additional gravitational energy lost during compression.
 
Rido12 said:
Which equation is appropriate to solve this?

$$mgL=\frac{1}{2}k(\Delta x)^2-mg \Delta x$$
Looks good to me. Typically we set an origin for the spring potential energy to be at the top of the uncompressed spring as the spring has no PE there and choose a positive direction in the direction of the spring compression. So you can actually get rid of the deltas there.

-Dan
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top