Physics teacher needs help with lab on Newton's laws

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a high school physics lab exploring Newton's laws using two carts, one with a spring and one without. The teacher, Peter, observed unexpected results when adding mass to the spring cart, leading to greater acceleration in the lighter cart during subsequent trials. Participants clarified that the force from the spring acts over time, allowing the lighter cart to experience increased acceleration due to prolonged contact with the spring. The conversation emphasized the importance of impulse-momentum principles in understanding the observed phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with Hooke's law and spring mechanics
  • Knowledge of impulse-momentum theory
  • Basic experimental design in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of impulse and its relation to momentum change
  • Investigate the effects of friction on acceleration in physics experiments
  • Learn about the practical applications of Hooke's law in real-world scenarios
  • Review experimental methods for measuring force and acceleration in lab settings
USEFUL FOR

High school physics teachers, students conducting physics experiments, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of Newton's laws and impulse-momentum concepts.

Sam 2002
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello! I am a high school teacher and I am doing a lab on Newton's laws. I need help interpreting part of the lab because the results did not come out to what the laws would have predicted.

The lab consisted of setting up two carts, one with a spring which can be compressed and one without. The first part of the experiment says the students should depress the spring and put the carts together. When released, they both go opposite ways with the same acceleration. So far so good, Newton's 3rd law tells us there will be an action-reaction pair and the 2nd law tells us that a=F/m.

Next, a 1 kg mass is added to the cart with the spring. Again the spring is compressed, they are put together, and the spring is released. Uh-oh. Now here is the problem. We know that again, there is an action and reaction pair, so the force will be the same on both carts. Since the mass of the second cart is greater, its acceleration will be smaller. But what about the cart with no weight. Correct me if I am wrong, but the acceleration here is again equal to F/m where F = -kx (Hooke's law). The force has not changed, the mass has not changed, so the acceleration should be the same as it was in the first trial. Right? All of my students reported a greater acceleration in the second trial for the cart with no added mass than in the first trial. Also, as the mass on the other cart increased to 2kg, the acceleration on the cart with no mass added increased again. Am I missing something, or are there real world factors that would make account for these observations? I considered conservation of momentum, but this does not change anything as the increase in mass of the first cart should be offset exactly by the decrease in its velocity

Thank you so much if you took the time to read this and reply.

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sam 2002 said:
Hello! I am a high school teacher and I am doing a lab on Newton's laws. I need help interpreting part of the lab because the results did not come out to what the laws would have predicted.

The lab consisted of setting up two carts, one with a spring which can be compressed and one without. The first part of the experiment says the students should depress the spring and put the carts together. When released, they both go opposite ways with the same acceleration. So far so good, Newton's 3rd law tells us there will be an action-reaction pair and the 2nd law tells us that a=F/m.

Next, a 1 kg mass is added to the cart with the spring. Again the spring is compressed, they are put together, and the spring is released. Uh-oh. Now here is the problem. We know that again, there is an action and reaction pair, so the force will be the same on both carts. Since the mass of the second cart is greater, its acceleration will be smaller. But what about the cart with no weight. Correct me if I am wrong, but the acceleration here is again equal to F/m where F = -kx (Hooke's law). The force has not changed, the mass has not changed, so the acceleration should be the same as it was in the first trial. Right? All of my students reported a greater acceleration in the second trial for the cart with no added mass than in the first trial. Also, as the mass on the other cart increased to 2kg, the acceleration on the cart with no mass added increased again. Am I missing something, or are there real world factors that would make account for these observations? I considered conservation of momentum, but this does not change anything as the increase in mass of the first cart should be offset exactly by the decrease in its velocity

Thank you so much if you took the time to read this and reply.

Peter


Just a thought. The force does not act at a single time. It keeps acting as long as the two objects are in contact. Do you have any way to estimate the amount of time the lower mass cart remains in contact with the spring?

So my intuition tells me that when you increase the mass of cart A, because it accelerates less the other cart remains on contact with the spring for a longer period of time and that ends up creating a larger force on it.
This makes sense if you think of the limit as the mass of cart A goes to infinity. Then basically it's as if cart A is a wall. Try it: connect cart B to the spring connected to a wall and measure its acceleration. It should be even larger than when it was connected to cart A with 2 kg on it.
 
Thanks! That makes sense. I appreciate the help.

Peter
 
Like nrged said, the force acts for longer than an instant. As a physics teacher, you should be familiar with the idea the the impulse of a system is equal to the momentum change.
Try applying the equation: F{\Delta}t={\Delta}mv. Let us know how that works.
 
Yes, that works too. I am of course familiar with the impulse-momentum equlivalency, just an oversight on my part to take it into consideration.
 
Sam 2002 said:
Thanks! That makes sense. I appreciate the help.

Peter

You are very welcome.
Glad I could help a fellow teacher :smile:
 
It might seem clearer to your students if you put it this way; the total acceleration in the system remained the same, but is now unevenly distributed. because one cart is now more resistent to acceleration, the other cart gets more of it (you could probably word it better; I ain't no teacher). Then have them measure exactly how much less acceleration the weighted cart undergoes, and see if it isn't exactly (or almost exactly; allowing for friction and what-naught) the same amount as has been added to the other cart. Or you might start with the measurement, and have them figure it out, probably a better learning experience, but might take more time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 117 ·
4
Replies
117
Views
9K