Physics vs. Applied physics *departments*

AI Thread Summary
When considering graduate school applications, the choice between applying to a physics or applied physics department depends on the specific research interests and focus areas of each program. It's advisable to apply to the department that aligns best with the intended specialization, as some fields, like condensed matter physics, may be better suited to applied physics, while high energy physics typically falls under traditional physics. For applicants unsure of their specialization but interested in multiple fields, it's beneficial to identify the most compelling projects at each school and apply accordingly. Engaging directly with department representatives for clarification on research focus can provide valuable insights and help inform the application strategy.
WarPhalange
I'm looking for graduate schools now, and noticing that some schools have separate applied physics departments. If I want to apply to the school, do I only apply for physics or applied physics, or should I apply for both to have a better chance of getting in?

This is of course assuming that both departments have research I'm interested in, and so far yes, that has been the case.

I already have 10 places I'd be applying to, which is a lot of time and money to invest. If it doesn't help me at all to apply to both departments, then I'd just do 1 per school.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For schools such as Stanford, I don't think it makes that much of a difference. But I think you do need to look at what each department focuses in. If we go by with the Stanford example, if you intend to do condensed matter physics, then it should be from the Applied Physics Dept. But if you are going to go into high energy physics, then it should be from the Physics Dept. I believe the department description lists quite clearly which area of physics each one covers.

Zz.
 
Yes, but in my case I'm not sure what I want to specialize in, but I have fields I'd like to work in. So I'll basically have to find for each school the most interesting project they have and just apply to that. The thing with Applied vs. Regular physics is that both departments have things I'd like, even if they are different, so I wouldn't mind either.
 
I know that there isn't a hard rule across all universities, or even programs. If you're interested in both, then contact the departments and ask!
 
...that's a good idea. Thanks. :)
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
71
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
60
Back
Top