Physics-Young's Double Slit Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter frankene
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Double slit Slit
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the distance between the third-order red and yellow-green fringes in a double-slit experiment. The slits are 0.143 mm apart, with red light at 665 nm and yellow-green light at 565 nm. After calculating the angles for both wavelengths using the formula Theta = sin-1((m*lambda) / d), the user found the positions on the screen. The initial answer of 0.005 m was incorrect due to a miscalculation in the final conversion, which should have been 4.804 mm. The user successfully corrected the error and expressed relief at resolving the issue.
frankene
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello! I am stuck on a problem that seems so easy. The question is:

Two slits are 0.143 mm apart. A mixture of red light (wavelength = 665 nm) and yellow-green light (wavelength = 565 nm) falls on the slits. A flat observation screen is located 2.29 m away. What is the distance on the screen between the third-order red fringe and the third-order yellow-green fringe?

I solved for Theta for both red light and the yellow-green light. (m = 3)

Theta = sin-1((m*lamda) / d)

Red: Theta = sin-1((3 * 665e-9) / .143e-3) = .799 degrees

Yellow-green: Theta = sin-1((3 * 565e-9) / .143e-3) = .679 degrees

From there I solved for the distance and subtracted the two:

y = L * tan theta

Red: y = 2.29 * tan(.799) = 0.032m

Yellow-green: y = 2.29 * tan(.679) = 0.027m

I get an answer of 0.005m but the site says my answer is wrong. Any hints as to what I am doing wrong?

Thank you for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
try inputting your answer to the same degree of accuracy as the slit seperation, try 4.804 mm
 
Thank you! It had to be in meters so it took 4.804e-3 meters! I am glad it was an easy fix. I thought I had a grasp of this concept and I was frustrated when I couldn't get the correct answer.

Thank you again!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top