Picking a Good Textbook: Factors to Consider

  • Thread starter Thread starter Defennder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Text
AI Thread Summary
When deciding to buy a textbook for physics, math, or engineering, key factors include the availability of practice exercises with solutions, the book's reviews on platforms like Amazon, its cost, and whether it is recommended for a specific class. Many emphasize the importance of having numerous exercises to reinforce learning, while others caution against relying solely on reviews due to potential biases. The cost per page is also a consideration, with a general threshold for affordability noted. Additionally, familiarity with the author and the book's status as a standard reference can influence the decision. Ultimately, the choice hinges on balancing these factors to find a textbook that best fits individual learning needs.
Defennder
Homework Helper
Messages
2,590
Reaction score
5
What do you guys look for before deciding to buy a textbook? Assume that you don't have any recommendations for texts, or that you have recommendations for 2 or more but can afford time and money enough to buy and read thoroughly only 1 of them. Then what do you consider most important before deciding to buy a text? I'm talking about physics, maths and engineering textbooks

I assume the following factors are important:

1. Practice excercises, problems with accompanying solutions at the back.
2. Favourability of reviews on Amazon.com (yeah I know this one is pretty subjective, but if a number of reviews on Amazon tell you that quite a number of numerical solutions to the problems of a textbook are erroneous, would you still buy the book?)
3. Cost and pricing of book.
4. Whether or not it's the recommended text for the class you're taking?

What else should I consider?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Practice excercises, problems with accompanying solutions at the back.
Why is that good? Make up you own problems and solve them.
Most books have plemty of problems anyway it takes a will to do the seval hundred problems most books give
2. Favourability of reviews on Amazon.com (yeah I know this one is pretty subjective, but if a number of reviews on Amazon tell you that quite a number of numerical solutions to the problems of a textbook are erroneous, would you still buy the book?)
Those reviews can be helpful but many are suspect
"I reals good at matho but dis book gots ting call theorem arnd proof me no like book be's many bads and stuff dude!"
Errors are at times an irritation, but many good books have them and it would be a shame to miss out on them due to a few typos. Think glass is half full
Exercise for student:Find all errors
You did want more exercises
3. Cost and pricing of book.
Definitly important
$0.1/page is tolerable just barely
many good books are $0.25 and up some as high as $1
they are not that good
4. Whether or not it's the recommended text for the class you're taking?
Many horrible texts are recomended
Even good texts might not mesh with ones personal style

I look at
1)Other books by the Author I may be familar with (dangerous as many Authors quality is variable)(on the other hand useful information is often gained)
2)Is the book a standard? if so it may be of use even if somewhat flawed
3)Recomendations from TRUSTED sources
persons here
famous mathematicians
peers
Good Authors
4)best method lay eyes upon book even if briefly check contents level style ect.
 
Well firstly, given that as a student, I wouldn't know whether or not I've understood a concept correctly before solving problems. So how would you expect a student to know if either they are wrong or the textbook is? And more importantly, you claim that students should make up your own problems and solve them. Well I find this quite ridiculous, honestly. If we could do that, there'll be no need for textbook excercises. Excercises are meant to aid in understanding, so you can't treat them as though they're separate and independent of the conceptual explanations.

You speak of Amazon.com's book reviews as though most are written by leet-speaking inarticulate readers who are too clever by half to understand the text they're reviewing. I have looked through quite a number of textbook reviews by Amazon.com, and have yet to find even a single review which may be characterised as similar to your condescending typical example. I think it suffices to say that most reviews on Amazon are readable and provide a certain level of insight into the text. The only question is how serious should they be regarded?
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Back
Top