Picky about initial velocity condition

AI Thread Summary
In kinematic problems, initial velocity can be zero or nonzero depending on the context. For a rocket at takeoff, it starts with zero initial velocity but experiences upward acceleration. Conversely, when a block is pushed with an impulsive force, it has a nonzero initial velocity once released. The distinction lies in the time frame and the specific phase of motion being analyzed. Understanding the importance of the motion's context is crucial for determining initial velocity conditions.
fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
In simple kinematic problems,

the initial velocity can be zero or some nonzero value.

A friend asked me: what makes it zero in some cases and nonzero in some others.

Take a rocket in take off. It has acceleration moving upward, from the beginning, but its v_0=0.

Instead, if I apply an impulsive force on a tiny block on a table and then let it go, we say that there is a certain v_0...

Do we have to assume that they both are actually starting from zero speed, but over a very small delta_t, the average velocity of the rocket is still very very small (amost zero), and that average velocity corresponds to the instantaneous velocity at that point.

In the case of the small block being pushed with an impulsing force, the instantaneous velocity is not taken as zero, because the velocity change in that short delta_t is not negligible...

IS this a correct explanation?
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends which part of the motion is important for you. I mean depends on the situation. For your rocket example, if I am interested in the motion after the first stage boosters have been exhausted, my initial velocity will not be zero.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top