Proportion of Pupils Speaking 3 Languages Out of Total Number of Pupils

  • Thread starter Thread starter Matt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the proportion of pupils who speak three languages out of a total of 29 pupils. The initial method presented incorrectly divides the total number of pupils by those who speak three languages, leading to an erroneous interpretation of the question. The correct approach is to find the ratio of pupils speaking three languages to the total number of pupils, resulting in a proportion of approximately 0.1 or 10%. The confusion stems from misunderstanding the concept of proportion versus division of total counts. Clarifying the methodology reveals that the correct answer reflects the actual percentage of multilingual pupils in the class.
Matt
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I have attached a screenshot of the question. The methodology and answer that makes sense to me is the following:

29 (Total number of pupils) / 3 (Number of pupils who speak 3 languages) = 9.7 (1 d.p)

The answer given:
3 / 29 = 0.1 (1 d.p)

Have a misunderstood the question here? Any help is greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-11-21 at 21.25.13.png
    Screen Shot 2014-11-21 at 21.25.13.png
    65.3 KB · Views: 538
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your method gives you how many times a class of 29 pupils can be divided up into sets of 3 pupils. That wasn't the question.

Your answer gives 900+ percent. How do you get more than 100% of the class? Obviously you can't. The answer given in the figure is correct.
 
Matt said:
29 (Total number of pupils) / 3 (Number of pupils who speak 3 languages) = 9.7 (1 d.p)
Look at a simpler case.
Four balls: red, green blue and yellow.
What proportion are red?
It wouldn't be total / red because that would give you 4.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-sln2)+e^(-sln3)+e^(-sln4)+... , Re(s)>1 If we regards it as some function got from Laplace transformation, and let this real function be ζ(x), that means L[ζ(x)]=ζ(s), then: ζ(x)=L^-1[ζ(s)]=δ(x)+δ(x-ln2)+δ(x-ln3)+δ(x-ln4)+... , this represents a series of Dirac delta functions at the points of x=0, ln2, ln3, ln4, ... , It may be still difficult to understand what ζ(x) means, but once it is integrated, the truth is clear...
Back
Top