Planck Temperature: Is It The Upper Limit?

flotsam
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Is there an upper limit on temperature? Is the 'Planck temperature' the upper limt?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think so. You can keep piling more and more energy into a system and it will raise its temperature further and further.

There is a theoretical lower limit on temperature though. That is absolute zero, when no particles move at all.

I was going to mention phonons here too, but are they strictly more to do with vibration than temperature, considering vibration and temperature are fairly interchangeable concepts?
 
Temperature is not a measure of energy in general. It is a measure of the average kinetic energy of particles in a given location.

So you're really asking whether there is an upper limit on kinetic energy, and whether this is called the Planck temperature.

The answer is yes, and yes.

Here is the Wikipedia entry, which covers it pretty neatly:

===

The Planck temperature, named after German physicist Max Planck, is the natural unit of temperature, denoted by Tp. The Planck units, in general, represent limits of quantum mechanics. Talking about anything being "hotter" than the Planck temperature doesn't make a lot of sense; it is the temperature at which black holes are theorized to evaporate and the temperature at which the Universe "started" and cooled down from there, according to current cosmology. It is difficult to imagine anything being hotter than the Big Bang.

Tp = Mp/k = square root of (hc^5/Gk^2) = 1.41679 × 10^32 K

where:

Mp is the Planck mass

c is the speed of light in a vacuum

h is the Reduced Planck constant (or Dirac's constant)

k is the Boltzmann constant

G is the gravitational constant
 
Hooloovoo said:
Temperature is not a measure of energy in general. It is a measure of the average kinetic energy of particles in a given location.
So you're really asking whether there is an upper limit on kinetic energy, and whether this is called the Planck temperature.
The answer is yes, and yes.
Here is the Wikipedia entry, which covers it pretty neatly:
===
The Planck temperature, named after German physicist Max Planck, is the natural unit of temperature, denoted by Tp. The Planck units, in general, represent limits of quantum mechanics. Talking about anything being "hotter" than the Planck temperature doesn't make a lot of sense; it is the temperature at which black holes are theorized to evaporate and the temperature at which the Universe "started" and cooled down from there, according to current cosmology. It is difficult to imagine anything being hotter than the Big Bang.
Tp = Mp/k = square root of (hc^5/Gk^2) = 1.41679 × 10^32 K
where:
Mp is the Planck mass
c is the speed of light in a vacuum
h is the Reduced Planck constant (or Dirac's constant)
k is the Boltzmann constant
G is the gravitational constant


Thanks for the reply.
What I now wonder is; how near to this temperature do the 4 forces (gravitation, electro-magnetism, weak and strong nuclear) combine to manifest themselves as one force? Is there any actual theoretical temperature at which this occurs? Is it the Planck temperature? Do you think there could be anywhere so hostile (theoretical or not) in the universe that in that place there is only one force?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Back
Top