Planck's Constant and the size of the atom

  • Thread starter Thread starter kirsten_2009
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom Constant
AI Thread Summary
If Planck's constant were smaller, the uncertainty principle would exhibit decreased uncertainty, allowing for more precise predictions of an entity's position and velocity due to a smaller energy quanta. This reduction in uncertainty would also imply that the size of atoms could be smaller, as the electron cloud's uncertainty would narrow, leading to a more accurate representation of electron positions. However, the fundamental nature of the uncertainty principle would remain unchanged; only the values associated with position, momentum, energy, and time would be affected. The discussion emphasizes the conceptual implications of a smaller Planck's constant on atomic structure and uncertainty. Overall, a smaller Planck's constant would enhance precision in measurements without altering the underlying principles.
kirsten_2009
Messages
136
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


[/B]
If Planck’s constant were smaller than it is, how would the uncertainty principle be affected and how would the size of atoms be affected?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I know this question has been kind of asked before in this forum but an answer was never really concluded. Could you guys be so kind and let me know if my reasoning and answer are "correct"?

A:// Conceptually speaking; the uncertainty principle would be affected in that it’s “uncertainness” would be decreased because if the quanta of energy was smaller (since it was multiplied by a smaller number); it means that the space occupied by the field would be smaller and thus the position and/or velocity of an entity would be more accurately predicted since there is less space the species could actually be in.

With regards to the size of the atom; a smaller value for Planck’s constant would allow atoms to be smaller than presumed because the uncertainty of the electrons position (and velocity) would decrease and so the electron “cloud” could be narrowed down with increased accuracy and decreased error.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What course are you doing and what handbook or notes is used?
 
It's an introductory physics course focusing mainly on concepts (with some calculations of course). We are using Physics: Concepts and Connections by Art Hobson.
 
The principle itself would not be affected I would think, but the product of the uncertainties in the values
- position, momentum, energy and time - would. Neither would the size of atoms, just the values would
be known with less uncertainty.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top