Plane Maps and Planar Graphs: A Mutual Relationship?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jummeh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Map Plane
Jummeh
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Plane Map <=> Planar Graph ??

Hi,
Wondering if anyone can help me to find some kind of proof that all Plane Maps can be represented by planar graphs and vice versa... for all Planar Graphs exists a Plane Map?

I did a quick search without much luck.

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Jummeh said:
Hi,
Wondering if anyone can help me to find some kind of proof that all Plane Maps can be represented by planar graphs and vice versa... for all Planar Graphs exists a Plane Map?

I did a quick search without much luck.

Thanks
I can only gave a rough guess, I may not even give an answer relevant to the question, but if I understand you, then each "region" or "country" on the map can be represented by a vertex of the graph, and every "border" between "regions" on the map can be represented by an edge on the graph.
 
yes basically, but why can there not be maps of non-planar graphs?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top