Planet positions and gravitational effects

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential influence of planetary positions on recent major earthquakes. It highlights that while some planets are opposite Earth, most significant celestial bodies are currently on the same side of the Sun. The gravitational effects of these planets on Earth are minimal compared to the Sun and the Moon. Additionally, the gravitational force diminishes with distance, making the impact of distant planets like Jupiter and Saturn negligible. Overall, planetary positions are unlikely to be a significant factor in earthquake occurrences.
Akfine
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Considering that most of the planets are opposite to us, excluding Saturn and Pluto, could that have anything to do with major earthqauke in the last couple of years?

Just a thought.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No. I suggest you start looking into this by seeing how many earthquakes there are in a typical year. (Hint: it's more than a few)
 
You can also calculate (even with Newton's expression for gravity) what the gravitational force is on the Earth.
 
Akfine said:
Considering that most of the planets are opposite to us, excluding Saturn and Pluto, could that have anything to do with major earthqauke in the last couple of years?

Just a thought.
Actually, most of the brighter (larger/closer) planets are on the same side of the Sun as we are, currently. And their gravitational effects on Earth are minuscule in comparison to that of the Sun, and even our own satellite, the Moon. Gravitational forces fall off as a square of the distance between the bodies in question, and the big guys (Jupiter, Saturn, etc) are very far away.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top