Understanding Gravitation: The Relationship Between Earth and Moon

  • Thread starter Thread starter KingOfTwilight
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation Planets
AI Thread Summary
The Moon is influenced by Earth's gravitational force, which keeps it in orbit, but it is not on a collision course with Earth. The gravitational interaction is mutual; while Earth pulls the Moon, the Moon also exerts a gravitational pull on Earth. Unlike a swinging object that loses energy due to friction and requires constant input to maintain its motion, the Moon experiences minimal resistance in space, allowing it to maintain its orbit without additional energy from Earth. Both the Earth and Moon orbit a common center of mass, with the center being closer to Earth due to its larger mass. Understanding gravitation involves recognizing that the Moon's orbit is stable and not subject to the same energy loss as a tethered object on a string.
KingOfTwilight
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
We all know that moon is under the influence of Earth gravitational force and vice versa. This force causes the circular motion of Moon (and Earth as well). Earth pulls Moon with a force F and Moon pulls Earth with the same force. This has occupied me a long time:
Will Moon eventually fall down to Earth (collision is maybe a better term)?

If not, how should I try to understand gravitation? At the moment I use this kind of example:
Earth is like me swinging an object around me, the object is attached to a string and the string is like gravitation, it holds the object on orbit. Still, this causes some problems to me. When I swing that object I'll lose energy (or do I?) - I can't swing it forever. However, Earth doesn't loose any energy "swinging" the Moon, does it?
What is wrong in my model?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KingOfTwilight said:
If not, how should I try to understand gravitation? At the moment I use this kind of example:
Earth is like me swinging an object around me, the object is attached to a string and the string is like gravitation, it holds the object on orbit. Still, this causes some problems to me. When I swing that object I'll lose energy (or do I?) - I can't swing it forever. However, Earth doesn't loose any energy "swinging" the Moon, does it?
What is wrong in my model?

What the string does is to keep the object from going in a straight line - in a direction tangential to its orbit/trajectory (the path the object would have taken in the absence of the tension in the string). Although you may lose energy in the physiological sense of the term and hence may losen your grip on the string, in the case of the Earth, it is not so. Everything that has mass gravitates. As long the there is the pull of gravity to keep the moon in place (strictly speaking, the moon does not maintain a perfect orbit and is slowly moving away), it's not going to collide with the Earth.

Hope this helps.
 
when you swing the object arounf you it will be slowed down due to friction (in the string as well as air resistance). In order to keep it rotating you will have to add energy into it all the time which will obvioulsy take energy from you and hence you can do it forever...

the moon on the other hand does have extremely low friction (not string holding it :)... nor very much fluid resistance if any). So it don't need to be acclerated to keep roatating unlike your object so the moon doesn't need any eergy from the earth...

but on the other hand the gravity doesn't only pull the moon towards the earth... it also pulls the Earth towards the moon.. so the Earth moves a litlte towards the moon. But as the moon rotates around the Earth and affects it from all sides it shouldn't move eearth very much...
 
Thanks, so my "string model" is correct, friction just takes too big effect and that's why it fails.
Strid: Yes. Both Earth and Moon go around one center of mass but Earth is so much bigger that the mass center isn't very far away from Earth's center.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top