Plano-Convex Lenses: Collimating Light w/ 2m Diam. at 30m Dist.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gapesteguia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the use of plano-convex lenses for collimating light from a standard 5 mm LED to achieve a beam diameter of approximately 2 meters at a distance of 30 meters. Participants explore the necessary focal lengths, distances between the LED and the lens, and the implications of lens diameter on beam divergence.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that to collimate the beam, the LED should be placed at a distance equal to the focal length of the lens, indicating that the image distance is effectively infinite.
  • Another participant notes that using a longer focal length generally results in better collimation and lower divergence of light rays, while a larger lens diameter can improve performance by reducing diffraction-limited beam divergence.
  • Specific calculations are provided regarding the necessary focal length, with a minimum focal length of approximately 75 mm suggested for the lens to achieve the desired beam characteristics.
  • Concerns are raised about the LED's geometry, as the active area emitting light may be smaller than the package diameter, potentially affecting collimation.
  • One participant mentions that using two lenses can yield better collimation than a single lens, although a single lens can still achieve satisfactory results with a high-quality LED.
  • Another participant critiques the uniformity of illumination from LEDs, suggesting modifications to the LED or alternative methods, such as using a fiber optic, to improve the light source quality.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the optimal setup for collimating light from an LED, with some agreeing on the importance of focal length and lens diameter, while others introduce alternative approaches and highlight limitations of LEDs as light sources. No consensus is reached on the best method or configuration.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various assumptions regarding the geometry of the LED and the implications for collimation, as well as the dependence on the specific characteristics of the light source. The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and varying perspectives on the effectiveness of different approaches.

gapesteguia
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a basic question about plano-convex lenses. suppose that I want to collimate the bean angle produced by a led (standard 5 mm leds). I want to obtain a circle diameter of 2 meters measured to 30 meters of distance. Suppose I have a wall to 30 meters of distance and I want to obtain a bean of 2 meters aprox. Which focal length should I use ? and what distance should be between the led (light source) and the plane side of the lens?


Thank you
German
 
Science news on Phys.org
Your image distance is infinite if the beam is collimated, so to first order you put the LED at a distance f=focal length away from the lens. It doesn't matter what f actually is as long as the object distance is equal to f. How well-collimated you can make the beam in practice depends on the lens and on the coherence of the light source.
 
The longer focal length you use, generally the better collimation that can be
achieved i.e. lower divergence of the light rays. Also the larger the diameter of
the lens, the better (lower) your diffraction limited beam divergence angle will be.

Keep in mind that the 5mm led may have a package diameter of 5mm, though the
active area that emits 90% of the light may be significantly smaller, and often
it's a ring-shape or some other kind of non-uniform geometry.

Anyway here's some rough data about the kind of performance and optical
system that (at a minimum) you're seeking.

atan(2m/30m) = 3.81 degree divergence.

2m/5mm = 400 = magnification of a 5mm diameter object projected onto a 2m width.

Where
p = distance from the lens to the object which in this case is the projected image of the source LED.
i = distance from the lens to the image of the object which in this case is the source LED
f = focal length of the lens.


The thin lens formula for a converging lens is:
1/p + 1/i = 1/f.

And the magnification is:
i/p.

For p/i = 400, and p=30m, i = 30000mm/400 = 75mm
1/p + 1/i = 1/f, so 1/30000mm + 1/75mm = 1/f = 1/74.8mm,
so f = 74.8mm.

So you'll place the LED slightly past the focal length of the PCX
lens, and the minimum focal length of the lens should be 75mm,
with greater FL giving better (narrower) best divergence.

The diameter of the lens should be such that it intercepts
most of your LED's light when the LED is positioned just beyond
the FL of the lens, at least if you're concerned about having
a maximum brightness projected spot.

So of course the wider the beam divergence angle from your LED's lens,
the wider you'd be advised to make your PCX lens' diameter.

You can make a better collimator with two lenses than you can with
one, however, but you can achieve similar results to what you've
described with one not-so-uncommon lens and a good ultra bright LED,
e.g. a few candelas, preferably one with a high candelas/steradian
figure and narrow beam angle.
 
Excellent explanation. It's very useful for me. Thanks.

xez said:
The longer focal length you use, generally the better collimation that can be
achieved i.e. lower divergence of the light rays. Also the larger the diameter of
the lens, the better (lower) your diffraction limited beam divergence angle will be.

Keep in mind that the 5mm led may have a package diameter of 5mm, though the
active area that emits 90% of the light may be significantly smaller, and often
it's a ring-shape or some other kind of non-uniform geometry.

Anyway here's some rough data about the kind of performance and optical
system that (at a minimum) you're seeking.

atan(2m/30m) = 3.81 degree divergence.

2m/5mm = 400 = magnification of a 5mm diameter object projected onto a 2m width.

Where
p = distance from the lens to the object which in this case is the projected image of the source LED.
i = distance from the lens to the image of the object which in this case is the source LED
f = focal length of the lens.


The thin lens formula for a converging lens is:
1/p + 1/i = 1/f.

And the magnification is:
i/p.

For p/i = 400, and p=30m, i = 30000mm/400 = 75mm
1/p + 1/i = 1/f, so 1/30000mm + 1/75mm = 1/f = 1/74.8mm,
so f = 74.8mm.

So you'll place the LED slightly past the focal length of the PCX
lens, and the minimum focal length of the lens should be 75mm,
with greater FL giving better (narrower) best divergence.

The diameter of the lens should be such that it intercepts
most of your LED's light when the LED is positioned just beyond
the FL of the lens, at least if you're concerned about having
a maximum brightness projected spot.

So of course the wider the beam divergence angle from your LED's lens,
the wider you'd be advised to make your PCX lens' diameter.

You can make a better collimator with two lenses than you can with
one, however, but you can achieve similar results to what you've
described with one not-so-uncommon lens and a good ultra bright LED,
e.g. a few candelas, preferably one with a high candelas/steradian
figure and narrow beam angle.
 
If you want uniform illumination LEDs are very poor sources.
The built-in round lens is a problem as is the structure of the LED junction istself.
A quick improvement is to file/polish the front of the LED flat, be careful not to file down to the internal parts. This at least gives you a more point source.

A better alternative is to either focus the LED down to a pinhole or launch it into a fibre and then use the output of the fibre as the source.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
8K