Playing Catch: Solving the Spacelike Communication Challenge

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
I am supposed to draw a space-time diagram representing "a game of catch (or a conversation) between two people at rest, 10 ft apart. How is it possible for them to communicate, given that their interval is spacelike?"

Firstly, how is this realistic when let's say that the ball takes 2 seconds to go between them. Then how in the world would -c*3+10*0.3084 be nonnegative>
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where does the original question end?

Henceforth, please use the template. It eliminates such confusion.

If the events are something like throwing & catching (no matter how far apart), the interval between the events is clearly timelike.
 
Gokul43201 said:
Where does the original question end?

Henceforth, please use the template. It eliminates such confusion.

I was using PF Nexus which does not provide the template, but I will switch to PF Prime.

The original question is verbatim:


"Draw a spacetime diagram representing a game of catch (or a conversation) between two people at rest, 10 ft apart. How is it possible for them to communicate, given that their separation is spacelike?"


Notice that I erroneously used "interval" instead of "seperation" in the thread-opening post.
 
Let's say A , the "thrower," is at (0,0) when he throws the ball. B, the receiver, is at (0,10) in A's frame.(Using (t,x) for events.) Only these events are spacelike and thus unrelated to the interval between throwing and catching.
 
OK. I kind of see the point of the question now. When A throws, B at that moment is outside the future of A. However, the resolution is that B at a later time is inside the future of A. This is a really weird question.
 
ehrenfest said:
OK. I kind of see the point of the question now.
I don't. It appears idiotic to me. I hope there's something non-trivial about it that I'm not seeing.
 
Gokul43201 said:
I don't. It appears idiotic to me. I hope there's something non-trivial about it that I'm not seeing.

LOL. You're probably right.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
82
Views
15K
2
Replies
93
Views
11K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
13K
Back
Top