Please confirm the direction of propagation for me.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Propagation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the propagation direction of an electric field defined by a specific equation. Participants explore the implications of the equation on the direction of propagation, particularly in relation to the spatial orientation of the electric field vector and its amplitude.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, Alan, questions whether the electric field propagates in both the +x and -x directions despite the electric field vector being oriented in the z-direction.
  • Another participant agrees with Alan's assertion that the electric field is not propagating along the z-axis, suggesting that the amplitude is directed in the z-direction.
  • A third participant raises a question about the definition of "propagation" and describes the shape of the electric field strength when plotted against x, noting it resembles an upside-down V.
  • This participant also suggests using Maxwell's equations to derive the magnetic field and subsequently the Poynting vector to determine energy flux.
  • Alan acknowledges the shape of the field strength and clarifies that the tip of the pyramid touches the z-axis at t=0, with the base spreading out in both +x and -x directions over time.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the orientation of the electric field vector but engage in a discussion about the definition of propagation and the implications of the field's shape. There is no consensus on the interpretation of propagation in this context.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes varying interpretations of the term "propagation" and how it relates to the electric field's behavior over time and space. There are also assumptions regarding the definitions of field strength and energy flux that remain unresolved.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
Please confirm the direction of propagation for me. If the E field is defined as:

[tex]\vec E \;=\; \frac{\mu_0 k}{2}(ct-|x|)\hat z[/tex]

1) With this equation, the direction of propagation of the E field in both + and – x direction even though the [itex]\vec E = \hat z E_z[/itex]?

2) The E field is not propagating along z axis at all even though [itex]\vec E = \hat z E_z[/itex]. This only mean the amplitude of the E field is in z direction.
Can someone confirm this for me?

Thanks

Alan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd say you are correct.
 
Yes, the electric field vector points in the z-direction at all spacetime points (EDIT: except where/when it vanishes, of course...)

But how do you define "propagation"?

When plotted against x, the absolute value of the field strength looks like an upside-down V whose tip touches the x-axis at t=0. The pyramid rises linearly in time.

I guess you could use a Maxwell equation to find the B-field, and then form the Poynting vector which then tells you the energy flux.
 
Thanks guys for the quick reply. Yes, it is a inverse pyramid shape but I think the tip touching the z axis at t=0 instead and the base spread out in + and - x direction with time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K