Please help: switching to math, good or bad

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustapha13
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A Biology freshman at a Canadian university is considering switching to math due to strong aptitude in the subject, despite concerns about their school's weaker math department compared to its renowned biology program. The discussion highlights the potential advantages and disadvantages of attending a less prestigious math department, noting that personal initiative, such as engaging in independent studies and seeking research opportunities, can mitigate the impact of a school's reputation. It emphasizes the importance of a solid foundation in core math subjects and performing well on standardized tests like the GRE, if applicable, to remain competitive for graduate school. The conversation also stresses the necessity of experiencing proof-based math courses to ensure a genuine interest in the field before making a switch. Overall, while the university's reputation can play a role, individual performance and preparation are deemed more critical for success in graduate studies.
Mustapha13
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
well I'm a Biology freshman at a Canadian University.
I'm thinking of switching to math for next year, since i am really good at it.
However my school is world-renowned for biology, and has a small/weak math departement.



will students from stronger math universities be at at an advantage over me in grad school?
Does the undergrad university make a diffrence, or is it just the student's intelligence?


Please respond so that i can decide and make the proper arrangment.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you like math, you should do math. If after deciding to bio, 10 years down the road you decide that you want to switch to do math, then your road will be more difficult.

I'm a Junior, at a small university that is in no way known for it's math department. There are advantages and disadvantages to that. For example, a large part of the department knows me, independent study, and research with a professor are both pretty accessible, however, the course selection is fairly low, we only have one course in algebra, and our second course in analysis is only offered once every 2 years. There are ways to make up for things like this, for example, you could try to do an independent study (probably an excellent way to get a good letter of recommendation), or attend something like Budapest Semesters in Mathematics, which offers a wide range of upper level math classes, to supplement your curriculum.

I think that if you have a very solid background in what is expected an undergraduate would take (Algebra, Linear Algebra, Analysis, Complex Analysis, Topology, Number Theory, Probability, ...), do some research, do well on the GREs (If Canadian schools look at them, I'm not familiar), earn good grades, and get good letters of recommendation, then you shouldn't be at a significant disadvantage as compared to someone coming from an institution with a better name brand, with the possible exception if the person is coming from some place like an Ivy.

That being said, have you done any real, proofs-based math courses? Most math is quite different than what you'll see in Calculus classes and in High School, and before you up and switch, you might want to make sure it's what you really want to pursue.
 
are you at guelph? I thought that you'd be at U of T, but they don't particularly have a "small and weak" math department; at least I don't think so
 
wisvuze said:
are you at guelph? I thought that you'd be at U of T, but they don't particularly have a "small and weak" math department; at least I don't think so

I'm sorry but i'd rather not say, are you familiar with the math level of Canadian universities?
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
397
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top