Pliers, pulsars and extreme physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Garth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Pulsars
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on Jocelyn Bell Burnell's groundbreaking discovery of pulsars during her postgraduate studies, which was overshadowed by the Nobel Prize awarded to her supervisor. Following the announcement, media attention focused more on her gender than her scientific contributions, highlighting the sexism in the field. The conversation also touches on prior observations of pulsars, including a missed opportunity from a 408 MHz sky survey where a significant discovery was dismissed due to equipment issues. Participants reflect on the common occurrence of misinterpreting data in scientific research, emphasizing the importance of thorough documentation. Overall, the discussion illustrates the challenges and biases faced by women in science, as well as the complexities of scientific discovery.
Garth
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
3,580
Reaction score
107
Ever wondered what it is like to make a major discovery in astrophysics?

You may be interested in reading Jocelyn Bell Burnell's account of how she discovered pulsars as a postgraduate: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/118807400/PDFSTART.

BTW, - Jocelyn is too gracious to mention this - so great was the discovery that it merited a Nobel Prize, which went to her supervisor!
There was a lot of publicity following the announcement. The Press descended and when they discovered that S J Bell was young and female, they descended even faster. And that was another very interesting experience. Typically they would ask Tony Hewish about
the astrophysical importance of the discovery. And then they’d turn to me and ask me what my vital statistics were or about how many boyfriends I had. I wasn’t shapely enough for page three, but that was all women were for. The science correspondent of the Daily
Telegraph actually named the objects. He was interviewing us one day and asked us what we were calling these things. We hadn’t considered the matter, so he said: “Well, there are quasars, what about ‘pulsar’ for pulsating radio star?”

I liked the bit about pulsar prior discoveries:
In the late 50s or early 60s there was an open night at, I think, Flagstaff Observatory
(Arizona). The person demonstrating the night sky had the telescope trained on the Crab Nebula (figure 4), and particularly on the Minkowski star, which we now know as the Crab Pulsar. A woman looked down the telescope and said “That star’s flashing”. The assistant explained to her about scintillation. “Yes,” she said, “I’m an airplane pilot. I know the difference between random scintillation and flashing. That star is flashing.” Nobody followed
it up.
A few years before we discovered pulsars there was a 408 MHz survey of the sky. This survey required big radio telescopes and the observers got time where they could. In what
they hoped was the last week of their survey, they were having problems with one of the
chart recorders. One day in the early hours the recorder pen started sweeping regularly: bleep,bleep, bleep… The radio astronomer concerned said “Damn” and thumped the pen recorder: it stopped “misbehaving”. Unfortunately he did not write anything in the logbook. If he had, they could have claimed a prior discovery for they were observing the pulsar PSR0328+54.

Ever thumped your apparatus to stop it misbehaving?

Garth
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Happens a lot, I think a German guy discovered the electron before Thompson but put it down to faulty equipement.

We used to teach a lab where a graph deliberately had a spike due to stray lead capacitance - most of the students removed the 'bad' measurement to get the straight line. Generally it was the 'best' students who knew what the result should look like.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...

Similar threads

Back
Top