Plotting f(x) = 9x4-11x3+3x2+1

  • Thread starter Thread starter alpha01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Plotting
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around plotting the function f(x) = 9x4 - 11x3 + 3x2 + 1, focusing on identifying local minima, maxima, and points of inflection to create an accurate graph.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of local maxima and minima, with one participant questioning the accuracy of their inflection point. Others suggest re-evaluating the approach to finding points of inflection and highlight potential errors in factoring and assumptions made during calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants confirm the correctness of local extrema calculations while others express uncertainty about the inflection points. There is an ongoing exploration of the methods used to derive these points, with suggestions for revisiting the calculations to ensure all solutions are identified.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the range of x-values plotted may affect the visibility of local extrema, and there is a concern regarding the division by zero in the context of finding inflection points.

alpha01
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using the local minima, local maxima and points of inflection of the following function, plot the graph:

f(x) = 9x4-11x3+3x2+1

The Attempt at a Solution



f(x) = 9x4-11x3+3x2+1

f ' (x) = 36x3-33x2+6x

= 3x(12x2-11x+2)

= 3x(3x-2)(4x-1)

therefore we have x = 0, 2/3, 1/4

now, finding the second derivative of the function we have:

f '' (x) = 108x2 - 66x + 6

plugging in our values of x into this, we have:

f '' (0) = 6

f '' (2/3) = 10

f '' (1/4) = - 15/4

therefore we have local minima x = 0, 2/3

and local maxima x = 1/4

I have also found 1 point of inflection to be: 0.029...

I have plotted the function using an online function plotter, and the local minima/maxima don't appear to correspond with the actual graph.

Could someone please show in which step i went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've calculated the correct local max/mins so if you plot from x=-1/3 to x=4/3 you should be able to see them. If you plot a larger range of x-values, these local max/mins will get blurred out.

Your inflection point on the other hand is incorrect. How did you arrive at it?
 
Thanks.. The point of inflection is 9.. i worked it out again.
 
I think there are two points of inflection, and neither is at x=9...maybe you should show me what you are doing to get your answer, so I can see where you are going wrong.
 
0 = 108x2-66x+6

0 = 108x2-54x-12x+6

0 = 54x(2x-1)-6(2x-1)

6(2x-1) = 54x(2x-1)

6 = (54x(2x-1)) / 2x-1

6 = 54x

x = 1/9

sorry i meant 1/9 not 9

is this still incorrect? as u said .. there should be 2 of them..
 
From [tex]0 = 54x(2x-1)-6(2x-1)[/tex] do you realize this can be factored? From the previous line you should've noticed the quadratic.
The reason why you are missing one of the points of inflection (whatever that is, I never learned it) is because you divided by one of the solutions.

When you divided by [tex]2x-1[/tex] this means that [tex]x\neq \frac{1}{2}[/tex] since you cannot divide by 0, but 0.5 is one of the solutions. You just need to be sure you approach the quadratic correctly so as to find all the solutions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K