Plotting T2 and T1 with Variable q: Tips for Graphing Equations

Click For Summary
To plot T1 and T2 based on the equation 0.02q = T1 - T2, consider treating (T1 - T2) as a single variable, allowing for a graph of q against the temperature difference. For a direct plot of T2 as a function of T1, a 3D plot can be created with T1 and q as independent variables, resulting in a planar surface. Alternatively, a 2D plot can be used, featuring parallel lines for different constant values of q. These methods provide a way to visualize the relationship between T1 and T2 effectively. Understanding these plotting techniques is essential for accurately representing the variables involved.
princesvpk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
i have an equation 0.02q=T1-T2

how do i plot a graph between T2 and T1...since all the three are variables i am not able to plot the graph between T2 and T1...kindly help...is der any method to approximate variable q to a constant? so dat i can plot the graph
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you think of (T1 - T2) as a single variable (delta temperature), you have an equation of a line and could plot q as the dependent variable vs (T1 - T2) as the dependent variable.
 
taking t1-t2 as difference of T we could sure plot a graph between diff(T) Vs q...but i need a plot btw T1 and T2...
 
If you want plot T2 as a function of T1, there are a couple of options. One is a 3D plot where the independent variables are T1 and q. In this case the plot will be a planar surface. Another option is in a 2D plot consisting of a series of parallel lines with each line corresponding to a different value of q.
 
Thank you for the reply.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K