Point (p, 4p²) on Curve y = 4x² for All p

  • Thread starter Thread starter MASH4077
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating that the point (p, 4p²) lies on the curve defined by the equation y = 4x² for all real values of p. Substituting x = p into the equation confirms that y equals 4p², thus satisfying the equation. Participants clarify that this substitution is sufficient to prove the point's presence on the graph. The initial uncertainty about the complexity of the problem is resolved, indicating it is straightforward. Overall, the conclusion is that (p, 4p²) is indeed on the curve for any real p.
MASH4077
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Show that the point (p, 4p^{2}) lies on the curve y = 4x^{2} for all real values of p.

I'm not at all sure how to go about answering this. I know that substituting p into y = 4x^{2} satisfies the equation. Is that enough?, or I'm not looking at this deep enough. Any hint(s) appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Saying a point is on the graph given by some equation, you are saying the x- and y-coordinates satisfy that equation. So yes, since substituting x = p into your equation gives y = 4p^2, you know that (p, 4p^2) is on the graph.
 
Looks like the question wasn't as difficult as I thought it was going to be.

Okay statdad thanks. :)

P.S. Appologies to moderators. I'll post these sorts of questions in the correct section next time. ;)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top