Points on a Plane: Representation with 1 or 2 Real Numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeremy22511
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Points
jeremy22511
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
If there is a bijection between R and R2, then why can't a point on a plane be represented by one real number instead of two?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you know of a bijection between R and R^2?
 
It can.
All those bijections are highly impractical for actual applications, using two values is much easier. If you are worried about memory: getting the same precision with a single number means you have to store (at least) twice the number of digits, so you don't gain anything.
 
jeremy22511 said:
If there is a bijection between R and R2, then why can't a point on a plane be represented by one real number instead of two?

The reason why we don't do this is because we often want that representation to satisfy some other properties. The bijections between ##\mathbb{R}## and ##\mathbb{R}^2## do not satisfy many other nice properties. Some properties that they can have are addition preserving, so it can be a group isomorphism. If you don't require injectivity, then it can be continuous. But that's basically where it ends. You can't make it be smooth, or linear. So this means that the bijections are not very geometrical and thus not very useful.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top