Polarization I = Io*cos^2 theta

AI Thread Summary
Two polarizers are oriented at 38.8 degrees to each other, and only 14.6% of the incident plane-polarized light passes through both. The relevant equation is I = Io*cos^2(theta), which describes the intensity of light transmitted through a polarizer. To find the initial polarization direction of the incident light, the equation can be rearranged to relate the known transmission percentages to the angle of the incident light. By substituting the known values into the equation, the angle of the incident light relative to the first polarizer can be calculated. This approach clarifies how to determine the initial polarization direction based on the given parameters.
DAP1MP13
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Two polarizers are oriented at 38.8o to each other and plane-polarized light is incident on them. If only 14.6 percent of the light gets through both of them, what was the initial polarization direction of the incident light?

Ok, I'm not exactly sure what this problem is asking for, do they want an angle or what?

So basically the only equation given for this section is I = Io*cos^2 theta.
I did ((cos*38.8)^2)((cos*38.8)^2) = .369...

I don't see how I can solve the problem with just this, I thought maybe I can relate it to Snell's eq., but there is no index (n) given.
Also I know that I-final = 14.6% = .146, but once again I don't really know what to do with this.

Any hints and help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
That equation, the law of Malus, tells you what percentage (of the intensity) of a polarized light beam gets through a polarizer set at an angle of \theta to the incident beam's plane of polarization. (And realize that when a beam passes through a polarizer, the part that survives is totally polarized along the axis of the polarizer.)

You figured out the percentage that got throught the second polarizer. So what must have been the percentage that got through the first? (You know the net percentage that got through.)
 
Thanks Doc Al

So the net amount that got through both polarizers was .369, but it says that .146 got through.
The amount that went throught the first would just be (cos38.8)^2 = .607.

I still don't know how this would help me to get the answer...
Through 1st polarizer => .607
Through 2nd polarizer => .369 or .146
How would this information tell you what was the initial polarization direction of the incident light?
 
Can I get some more help on this please?

Thanks
 
DAP1MP13 said:
Two polarizers are oriented at 38.8o to each other and plane-polarized light is incident on them. If only 14.6 percent of the light gets through both of them, what was the initial polarization direction of the incident light?

Ok, I'm not exactly sure what this problem is asking for, do they want an angle or what?

So basically the only equation given for this section is I = Io*cos^2 theta.
I did ((cos*38.8)^2)((cos*38.8)^2) = .369...

I don't see how I can solve the problem with just this, I thought maybe I can relate it to Snell's eq., but there is no index (n) given.
Also I know that I-final = 14.6% = .146, but once again I don't really know what to do with this.
there are 2 angles involved in this problem.
first, the 2 polarizers are rotated relative to one another by angle θ2=38.8°
then, the plane polarized incident light is rotated relative to the first polarizer by angle θ1.
the total net transmission thru both polarizers is given to be 0.146, so the transmission equation is:
I = I0cos21)cos22)
or rearranging and placing known values into the equation:
I/I0 = 0.146
= cos21)cos22)
= cos21)cos2(38.8°)

cos21) = (0.146)/cos2(38.8°)
cos(θ1) = SQRT{(0.146)/cos2(38.8°)}

Now solve for θ1 to find the incident light angle (relative to first polarizer).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top