Polarization-Magnetization Tensor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vectronix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the polarization-magnetization tensor, which is linked to charge conservation in materials, represented by the equation ∂μjμ=0. The tensor Pμν, defined as antisymmetric (Pμν=-Pνμ), is not completely specified due to the existence of homogeneous solutions that satisfy the equation ∂νP^homνμ=0. In optics, this ambiguity allows for the magnetization to be set to zero. The conversation also touches on the relationship between electric polarization and magnetization, emphasizing their interconnectedness across different frames of reference. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping the fundamental principles of electromagnetism.
Vectronix
Messages
64
Reaction score
2
Please forgive me if I chose the wrong thread level. I don't think this is an undergrad topic but I'm not sure. I'm looking for some info about the polarization-magnetization tensor; I can't seem to find it anywhere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The polarisation magnetisation tensor ##P_{\mu \nu}## may be seen to be a consequence of the conservation of the charges inside a material. If ##j_\rho## is the charge current density vector, then charge conservation means ## \partial^\mu j_\mu=0##. This will be fulfilled for any j fulfilling ##j_\mu=\partial^\nu P_{\nu\mu}## where ##P_{\mu\nu}=-P_{\nu\mu}##. However, this does not specify the tensor ##P## completely, as P is defined only up to a solution of the homogeneous equation ##\partial^\nu P^\text{hom}_{\nu\mu}=0##. In optics this freedom is used to set the magnetisation to zero.
 
Thank you for the information. I have a question though: why are electric polarization and magnetization considered to be one entity like space and time, like energy and momentum?
 
Vectronix said:
Thank you for the information. I have a question though: why are electric polarization and magnetization considered to be one entity like space and time, like energy and momentum?
Because magnetization in one frame is magnetization and polarization in another frame.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top