Pole Splitting equation question

  • Thread starter Thread starter bitrex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pole Splitting
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the pole splitting equations found on Wikipedia, particularly the equation relating load output to amplifier input (Vl/Vi). The user is confused about the origin of the zero in the numerator of the transfer function and its relationship to amplifier gain. They expected the transfer function for the output network to mirror that of the input network, with the addition of Cc in parallel with Cl. Additional resources from old journals and magazines are offered for further clarification. The conversation highlights the complexities of understanding transfer functions in pole splitting scenarios.
bitrex
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to follow along with the equations on the wikiepdia page for pole splitting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pole_splitting. However, I'm having a bit of trouble understanding the equation about halfway down that relates the load output to the amplifier input, Vl/Vi. Where does the zero in the numerator in the transfer function come from, that term divided by the amplifier gain? I thought the transfer function for the output network would be essentially identical to that of the input network, just with Cc in parallel with Cl. Thanks for any insight.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Send me a PM with a valid email address, and I'll send you some material from old journals and magazines on the topic.
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K