Polynomial Degree n Basis: 1,x,x^2...x^n

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zhang Jiawen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Polynomial
Zhang Jiawen
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I knew that a polynomial of degree n has n+1 basis, i.e 1,x,x^2...x^n;
But what if a0=0,i.e the constant term is 0, like x^3+x, then what is the dimension and the basis? Is there only x(one dimension) as the basis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The basis is not a basis of a polynomial, it is the basis of a module of polynomials, which is a set with added algebraic structure.

Elements of modules and vector spaces do not have dimensions or bases. It is the module or vector space that has those things.

The representation of ##x^3+x## in the above basis is (0, 1, 0, 1, 0, ..., 0).
 
Zhang Jiawen said:
I knew that a polynomial of degree n has n+1 basis, i.e 1,x,x^2...x^n;
But what if a0=0,i.e the constant term is 0, like x^3+x, then what is the dimension and the basis? Is there only x(one dimension) as the basis?
Just drop "1" from the basis you give so the dimension is n.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top