Pool Solar Heating - Help orienting the roof-top solar collector please

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the optimal orientation for installing pool solar collectors in Alamo, California. Three roof faces are considered: Face #1 receives the most direct afternoon sunlight, Face #2 has similar total sunlight but a less optimal afternoon angle, and Face #3 captures the most total sunlight throughout the day but with less direct afternoon exposure. Installers disagree on the importance of angle of attack for pool solar heating, with some advocating for maximizing total light exposure while others emphasize the need for perpendicular alignment during peak sunlight hours. Key thermodynamic considerations include the temperature of the pool water and ambient conditions at different times of day.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solar thermal energy principles
  • Knowledge of roof orientation and solar exposure
  • Familiarity with thermodynamics related to heat transfer
  • Basic concepts of solar collector efficiency
NEXT STEPS
  • Research optimal solar collector orientation for thermal efficiency
  • Learn about the impact of angle of attack on solar heating systems
  • Investigate the thermodynamic principles of heat transfer in solar applications
  • Explore the differences between plastic and insulated solar collectors
USEFUL FOR

Homeowners considering pool solar heating, solar energy enthusiasts, and professionals in the solar installation industry seeking to optimize collector performance.

seanduffy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello there, Physics forum. I live in Alamo, California and I'm planning to install pool solar. All of the installers have completely different POVs on which face of the roof I should put them, and hoping to get some physics-based advice. Here's the home with the 3 face options (front already has actual solar, so can't use).

Sat view .png


Two installers really like using both faces #1/2 (individually the system might not be large enough), and two others like face #3.

Considerations:
  • Face #1 gets the most direct afternoon sunlight with the best angle of attack
  • Face #2 is about equivalent to face #1 for total sun, but afternoon angle of attached worse
  • Face #3 probably gets the most TOTAL SUNLIGHT for the day, but afternoon sun is less direct. Morning sun is stronger.
I'm getting very different answers on if with pool solar, the angle of the sun relative to the panel matters or doesn't matter like it does with electrical solar. One installer says, all you're doing is heating the collectors so better to optimize for total light. Another says shoot for the most perpendicular afternoon angle of sun to panels.

Any guidance or thoughts on how to approach this problem? Things I need to come up with a point of view on:
  • What are the optimal thermodynamics here and time of day considerations?
    • The pool water itself will be colder in the AM, as will the ambient temp and panel temp? What set up at the end of the day transfers the most heat to the pool water -- e.g. a.) running slightly colder AM water through panels that may heat up a little more quickly on face #3 given the AM light? b.) running slightly warmer afternoon water through warmer afternoon panels (might argue for face #1).
  • Does the angle of attack matter for pool solar (i know it does for electrical) relative to how how the panels get?
  • For the installers that are eyeing using both faces #1/2 does that create a problems / inefficiencies that the panels would be different temperatures throughout the day?
Thanks so much if you're open to spending a minute to help me think through this!

Sean
 
Science news on Phys.org
Welcome!
What is the prevailing direction of winds?

Here in Florida, South is the preferred orientation.
As we are located on the North hemisphere, the Sun comes out from the ESE and goes down at the WSW.
Therefore, 20 some degrees of slope, facing South, gets the most Sun exposure intensity and time.

That being said, many customers complain about the low effectiveness of new plastic solar collectors.
The reason is wind exposure of the naked plastic tubing webs.
Old stile collectors had an insulated enclosure with a single or double glass, which greatly reduced heat loss due to wind.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
10K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
35
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K