I Position of a point as a function of angular position

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the position of point M as a function of the angular positions of two axes, a and c, in a mechanical system with three segments. The segments are defined by their lengths and rotational freedom, with specific angles between them. The user seeks to derive a mathematical relationship for M based on the angles α and γ, while noting the complexity of combining the rotations around both axes. Various approaches are suggested, including using polar coordinates and considering the geometric constraints between the segments. The conversation emphasizes the need for careful consideration of angles and positions to accurately model the system's behavior.
Andrea Vironda
Messages
69
Reaction score
3
Hi,
I have this scheme, in which there are 3 segments:
- I is coaxial to c axis and free to rotate in the origin. Length d1
- II is coaxial with a axis and free to rotate around c axis. There a fixed angle θ between a and c axis. Length d2
- III is welded to II, it's the PM segment. α is fixed between a axis and segment III. Length d2

Both a and c axis are free rotate of about 10" per step, so they have not continuous movement. About 130.000 possible position for a 360 deg rotation.
I'd like to find a relation between position of point M in function of angles: so ##M(x,y,z)=f(\alpha, \gamma)## where ##\alpha = a_{axis}## angular position and ##\gamma = c_{axis}## angular position, ##0 \leq \gamma, \alpha \lt 360 ° ##

How could i proceed?
I can easily achieve the result fixing c axis and only rotating a axis, but i don't know how to combine them together.
For example, if a axis is fixed i will obtain ##x^2 + z^2 = (d_3+d_2 \cos\theta)^2##
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20201204_205730.jpg
    IMG_20201204_205730.jpg
    31.5 KB · Views: 204
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi. Laying intermediate ##C_2## rod on X axis and ##d_1## rod on XY plane would be helpful. See attached figure.
 

Attachments

  • img20201206_08145602.jpg
    img20201206_08145602.jpg
    77 KB · Views: 188
Last edited:
Hi,
I noticed I used ## \alpha## twice. It's the angle of rotation of d2 and d3 around a axis. It's not the angle between d2 and d3 (that's a constant angle). The 2 degree of freedom are the rotations around a and c axis.
 
Hi. I am not sure I catch your setting, so I would say about general case.

Rod 1 with one end is fixed with Origin by free joint:
The (x,y,z) coordinate of the other end, using the polar coordinate :
(r_1 cos\theta_1, r_1\sin\theta_1\cos\phi_1,r_1\sin\theta_1\cos\phi_1)=\mathbf{r_1}

Rod 2 with one end is fixed with free end of rod1 by free joint:
The coordinate of the other end:
(r_1 cos\theta_1, r_1\sin\theta_1\cos\phi_1,r_1\sin\theta_1\sin\phi_1)+<br /> (r_2 cos\theta_2, r_2\sin\theta_2\cos\phi_2,r_2\sin\theta_2\sin\phi_2) =\mathbf{r_1}+\mathbf{r_2}

rod 3 with one end is fixed with free end of rod2 by free joint:
The coordinate of the other end:
(r_1 cos\theta_1, r_1\sin\theta_1\cos\phi_1,r_1\sin\theta_1\sin\phi_1)+<br /> (r_2 cos\theta_2, r_2\sin\theta_2\cos\phi_2,r_2\sin\theta_2\sin\phi_2)<br /> +(r_3 cos\theta_3, r_3\sin\theta_3\cos\phi_3,r_3\sin\theta_3\sin\phi_3) =\mathbf{r_1}+\mathbf{r_2}+\mathbf{r_3}

Constraints of the angle between rod1 and rod2,
\mathbf{r_1}\cdot\mathbf{r_2}=r_1 r_2 \ cos \alpha_{12}
\cos\theta_1\cos\theta_2+sin\theta_1\sin\theta_2(cos\phi_1cos\phi_2+\sin\phi_1\sin\phi_2)=\cos\alpha_{12}
\cos\theta_1\cos\theta_2+sin\theta_1\sin\theta_2 cos(\phi_2-\phi_1)=\cos\alpha_{23}
,rod 2 and rod3
\mathbf{r_2}\cdot\mathbf{r_3}=r_2 r_3 \ cos \alpha_{23}
\cos\theta_2\cos\theta_3+sin\theta_2\sin\theta_3(cos\phi_2cos\phi_3+\sin\phi_2\sin\phi_3)=\cos\alpha_{23}
\cos\theta_2\cos\theta_3+sin\theta_2\sin\theta_3 cos(\phi_3-\phi_2)=\cos\alpha_{23}
 
Hi,
sorry but I can't understand how you set up angles, etc..
I've found a better image. How to outline the possible movements on an excel file?
1607339423281.png
 
@Andrea Vironda Thanks for your sketch. Now I think I understand the problem. I consider the process of rotation a-a by ##\alpha## : M to M' then rotation c-c by ##\gamma## : M' to M" as attached.
 

Attachments

  • img20201209_15223462.jpg
    img20201209_15223462.jpg
    77 KB · Views: 162
Last edited:
Consider that d1 and d3 are parallel at ##\alpha, \beta = 0##. In my attachment there's the correct position in M, but when i have ##\alpha = 90## I can't find the z position.
I can't imagine in my mind how much d3 is raised by ##\alpha## rotation
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20201209_213352.jpg
    IMG_20201209_213352.jpg
    40.5 KB · Views: 165
Hi. From your sketch attached, I see the problem says ##\phi_2=\phi_1=\phi## in my previous post.M[\alpha=0,\gamma=0]=(d_1+d_2 \cos\phi+d_3 cos 2\phi,\ d_2 sin\phi+d_3 sin 2\phi,\ 0)

As an initial position I take upper-full bent position and you take downer-parallel position, but they show no difference in essence. I will follow your way so as you said

M[\alpha=0,\gamma=0]=(d_1+d_2 \cos\phi+d_3, \ -d_2 sin\phi,\ 0)

Rotation with a-a axis by ##\alpha##. M flies up above XY plane and draw a circle of radius ##d_3 sin\phi##. P and the circle make a cone. Height of M (Z) is ##d_3 \ sin\phi \ \sin\alpha##. You should put plus minus signs in front depending on your definition of ##\alpha## turning direction.
You observe M draws a "standing" circle so X and Y coordinates also change with ##\alpha##. Careful consideration is needed as written in my sketch.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top