Position of particle in a box, is this a valid way to solve?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving problem 2.4 from Griffiths, which involves finding the expectation value of a particle's position in a one-dimensional box using the Schrödinger equation. The participant proposes an integral approach, specifically calculating the integral of the position multiplied by the square of the sine function, leading to the conclusion that the expectation value is a/2. The validity of this method is confirmed by the community, emphasizing the importance of performing the integral for thoroughness and understanding the implications of even and odd solutions in the context of quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the concept of expectation values in quantum systems
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, particularly definite integrals
  • Awareness of even and odd functions in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Perform the integral for the expectation value of position in a box using the sine function
  • Study the properties of even and odd solutions in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of boundary conditions on wave functions in quantum systems
  • Learn about the normalization of wave functions in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, particularly those studying wave functions and expectation values, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to the particle in a box model.

Monocles
Messages
463
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


This is problem 2.4 from Griffiths, where he asks to find the expectation value of the position of a particle in a box.


Homework Equations


Schrödinger equation.


The Attempt at a Solution



I wrote that

[tex]\frac{2}{a} \int_0^a x (sin(\frac{n \pi}{a} x))^2 dx = \frac{a}{2} + \frac{2}{a} \int_{-\frac{a}{2}}^{+\frac{a}{2}} x (sin(\frac{n \pi}{a} x))^2 dx = \frac{a}{2}[/tex]

By argument of moving the origin to a/2 and that the integrand becomes odd when you do that, and so the integral equals zero. Is this valid, or do I need to tidy up the integral some more?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to be a bit careful here because the symmetric particle in the box potential admits both even and odd solutions, i.e. sines and cosines. I would recommend that you actually do the integral and use your argument not as proof but as validation why the answer a/2 makes sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K