Position sensor for moving projectile

AI Thread Summary
For measuring the maximum vertical displacement of a magnet launched by an electromagnet, using fixed proximity switches may not provide the necessary accuracy due to small displacement increments. A suggested low-tech solution involves observing several launches and adjusting a stop on the pole to determine the maximum height based on when the sound of the magnet hitting the stop disappears. This method allows for a more precise measurement of the magnet's peak height. Additionally, the discussion highlights the challenge of accurately calculating vertical velocity and deceleration with minimal displacement. Overall, practical adjustments and careful observation are key to achieving accurate measurements in this experiment.
Jdo300
Messages
548
Reaction score
5
Hello All,

I am going to be conducting a basic physics experiment where a magnet, which can slide up and down a vertical pole is launched upward using an electromagnet. I am not sure how high this magnet will go yet but I'm expecting a maximum vertical displacement of no more than 6-12 inches. My question for you all is how to most accurately measure the maximum vertical displacement of the magnet when it is propelled upward?

Ideally, I want to use some kind of sensor to measure and record the maximum displacement that the magnet is launched to but I'm not sure how to accomplish this in an accurate way. I was thinking about using a series of proximity switches that could be triggered as the magnet is moving past but at this point, the displacement could be as little as 1/2 inch which would make it very hard to accurately calculate the vertical velocity and deceleration to get the height. What do you all think?

Thanks,
Jason O
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Presumably this is not a random launch and there is an independent variable associated with the electromagnet that controls the maximum height. A low tech solution to the problem is to watch a couple of launches and then clamp a stop on the pole at the point wheree you think the max. height is. Repeat the experiment and adjust the stop until the electromagnet barely reaches it. Listen for the sound of the electromagnet hitting the stop. You have maximum height at the point where the sound of the collision disappears.

I agree with you, having fixed sensors is problematic.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top