Positioning one's self for Industry-funded PhD

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges and considerations of pursuing a PhD in Mechanical Engineering (MechE) through industry-academia collaborations. Participants share experiences and insights regarding the feasibility of obtaining a PhD while working, especially in small companies that may lack support for such endeavors. The conversation highlights that industry-funded PhDs are becoming increasingly rare, with most opportunities found in sectors like aerospace and national labs. It is noted that in the UK and Europe, universities maintain control over the selection of PhD candidates, ensuring academic integrity, while companies typically fund research projects rather than directly sponsor employees for PhDs. In the U.S., while historically companies funded PhD research, this practice is declining. Networking opportunities may arise during the PhD process, but securing a job with the sponsoring company is not guaranteed. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of strategic positioning, networking, and understanding the evolving landscape of industry-academia collaborations in pursuing a PhD.
dawin
Messages
68
Reaction score
1
TL;DR said:
Do you have any experience (direct or indirect) with industry/academia collaborations for pursuing a science PhD (MechE is the one I'm referencing specifically). How did you or someone position themselves to work that out?

I have a BS in MechE, and work in R&D. I've been plugging away at my MS in MechE, about halfway through, and have been considering that a PhD may really be more intellectually and personally what I want.

I've spoken to some old professors and friends with doctorates. I don't think I'm ready to commit fully to academia; I find working to be too fulfilling to give it up completely. Plus a mortgage doesn't help. Does anyone here have experience (direct or indirect) with getting a PhD through an employer/university collaboration?

I'm somewhat at a loss of how these things come up. I work at a small company, and don't think they'd be supportive. How does one position themselves into a situation conducive to the above? Does the employer come first? Advisor? Did you, or someone you know, go in with that goal known or did it come up after they started?

Right now I have a smattering of experiences, but mostly with composites (design and analysis). Through school, personal interest, and some work projects my real interests actually lies more in structural dynamics/controls. Not sure if that muddies the waters at all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Those kinds of industry-funded Ph.Ds are getting rarer and rarer. Most companies just aren't interested anymore. The only people I know who have done them worked either for National Labs or the Areospace/Defense industry.
 
From my experience in the UK and Europe, it doesn't work the way that you imply. The company funds the university to do a research project. The university decides whether that project is suitable for one or more PhDs (with the agreement of the company, since there may be intellectual property issues because the PhD thesis will finish up in the public domain).

The university then selects the PhD student completely independent from the company - i.e. the university has full control over the academic integrity of awarding the PhD.

Of course the PhD candidate may use the opportunity to network with the sponsoring company and eventually be offered a job there, but that isn't guaranteed.

The process in the USA be different of course, but one might expect the basic issue of academic integrity is the same - i.e. a company can't "buy" a PhD for one of its own employees.
 
AlephZero said:
From my experience in the UK and Europe, it doesn't work the way that you imply. The company funds the university to do a research project. The university decides whether that project is suitable for one or more PhDs (with the agreement of the company, since there may be intellectual property issues because the PhD thesis will finish up in the public domain).

The university then selects the PhD student completely independent from the company - i.e. the university has full control over the academic integrity of awarding the PhD.

Of course the PhD candidate may use the opportunity to network with the sponsoring company and eventually be offered a job there, but that isn't guaranteed.

The process in the USA be different of course, but one might expect the basic issue of academic integrity is the same - i.e. a company can't "buy" a PhD for one of its own employees.

The company typically doesn't "buy" a Ph.D. Historically it was common in the USA for a company to fund an employee's Ph.D. research (and pay them a salary). The student and the student's advisor chose the research, the company just paid the student and tuition.

This was a great deal indeed for the student but is getting less and less common these days.
 
carlgrace said:
Those kinds of industry-funded Ph.Ds are getting rarer and rarer. Most companies just aren't interested anymore. The only people I know who have done them worked either for National Labs or the Areospace/Defense industry.

Is this something that presented itself to them AFTER they worked for some time at the lab, available to anyone and they took it, started work there with that as a pretense?
 
And thanks to both of you for your responses!
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top