Positive and negative square roots

AI Thread Summary
Determining positive and negative square roots in equations requires careful consideration of the context, especially when the equation is complex. Substituting solutions back into the original equation is essential for verification, as squaring both sides can lead to non-equivalent results. In the discussed example, the equation +sqrt(...)=1-x yields two real roots, while -sqrt(...)=1-x has no real or complex roots. The necessity of verification highlights the importance of understanding which roots are valid in the original equation. Ultimately, substituting solutions is the most reliable method to confirm their validity.
kevs926
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
how to determine which is the answer to positive sqrt and negative sqrt in this problem?

substituting works but what if the equation is very long and you can't use calcu or computers

http://i.imgur.com/SkcQZ.png

also is there a way to solve this without squaring both sides?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
actually both are positive sqrt answers because there is no negative sqrt answer

also i think negative sqrt answers will come naturally.

but still, is there a way to solve this without squaring both sides?
 
This is why one has to do verification after solving an equation (unless he can guarantee that every step of the solution process is an equivalence ). In the case we consider only the negative or only the positive sqrt, when we square both sides we don't produce an equivalence. In the case we take both then we have an equivalence but there is no way to know which root belongs to which case unless we substitute the solutions to the original equation.

In this example the equation +sqrt(...)=1-x has two roots in R but the equation -sqrt(...)=1-x has no root in R (and no root in C also). I don't see other way to show the latter result, other than squaring, finding the two roots and then by substitution in the original equation to find out that they don't verify it.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top